figshare
Browse
ierp_a_1444479_sm8638.docx (2.32 MB)

Access to anti-cancer drugs in India: is there a need to revise reimbursement policies?

Download (2.32 MB)
Version 2 2020-01-28, 17:32
Version 1 2018-02-27, 07:17
journal contribution
posted on 2020-01-28, 17:32 authored by Gertruud Haitsma, Himanshu Patel, Parthasarathi Gurumurthy, Maarten J. Postma

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the access of Indian cancer patients to optimum cancer care under selected government schemes by reviewing reimbursement schemes for cancer care in India.

Methods: All cancer care reimbursement schemes in India were identified and three highly utilized schemes (VAS, RAS, CMCHS) were selected. Quality of breast, colorectal, lung, head & neck, and gastric cancer care was reviewed with respect to NCCN guidelines. Direct medical costs and shortage of budget in reimbursed amounts were calculated for each listed chemotherapy regimen.

Results: Medical oncology practice following the schemes’ formularies is inferior to recommendations by the NCCN guidelines. Innovative treatment (targeted therapies) like trastuzumab, pertuzumab (breast), bevacizumab, cetuximab, panitumumab (colorectal), erlotinib, gefitinib, crizotinib, and nivolumab (lung) are either not reimbursed (VAS, CMCHS) or partially reimbursed (RAS). Average shortage of budget was found to be 43% (breast), 55% (colorectal), 74% (lung), 7% (head & neck), and 51% (gastric cancer).

Conclusions: Policy makers should consider addition of newer treatments, exclusion of sub-optimal treatments, increments in per patient budget and optimization of supportive care, which may contribute to improvements in survival and quality of life for Indian cancer patients.

Funding

This paper is not funded.

History

Usage metrics

    Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC