figshare
Browse
Figure_3.tif (1.07 MB)

Visualization of differences between patients and controls with regard to the linear arousal-driven modulation of neural activation during the EPN-m time-interval (120–300 ms).

Download (0 kB)
figure
posted on 2013-08-19, 02:49 authored by Markus Burgmer, Maimu Alissa Rehbein, Marco Wrenger, Judith Kandil, Gereon Heuft, Christian Steinberg, Bettina Pfleiderer, Markus Junghöfer

A) In the top row of the first column, the neural clusters are displayed that show a cluster-level significance of p<.05 for the differences of patients and controls in the linear arousal contrast. The image was achieved by first calculating the contrast distribution (4, −1, −6, −1, 4, −4, 1, 6, 1, −4) for the interaction of the linear arousal contrast of PICTURE CATEGORY (HiPos > LoPos > Neut < LoNeg < HiNeg) with GROUP (patients, controls) with averaged z-values of a cluster containing a center dipole and its five closest neighbours. The contrast distribution was then masked with the significance level topography for this very contrast after 1,000 random permutations of all data sets (subjects x conditions) given a significance criterion of p<.05 and a cluster size of six. The masked contrast distribution, which highlights spatio-temporal clusters (6 dipoles, 120-300 ms) with significant effects on a cluster level, is displayed in z-values and projected onto a standard brain (back view). Bluish coloured areas indicate a decreased linear U-shaped arousal contrast for the picture categories in patients vs. controls visible at predominately left occipito-temporal areas. Black cylinders visualize the left occipito-temporal dipole locations used for the second level analysis. In the bottom row, the regional amplitude of the analyzed dipoles with regard to each picture category is displayed for patients and controls separately. B) as in A) with the exception that the masked contrast distribution projected on a standard brain is shown from the front and contains mainly reddish colours indicating an enhanced linear arousal modulation in patients vs. controls.

History