How open is your peer review?
Published on (GMT) by Jeroen Bosman
How open is your peer review? Workshop organized at Utrecht University Library as part of Open Access week 2015 From the workshop announcement: "Traditionally, peer review has been anonymous, not accessible to readers, and not for money. New initiatives aim to change this, making peer review more open, transparant and accountable. Is this good for science and scholarship, or will it harm researchers' careers? We will discuss pros and cons of (and perhaps even your experiences with) new forms and organisation of peer review at F1000, Copernicus, PLOS, BMJ, PeerageofScience, PubPeer and Publons, but would also like to take the discussion beyond these specific tools. Thus, you will leave this workshop with a concrete overview of peer review alternatives but also with an inspired view of the role of peer review."
CITE ITEMS FROM THIS PROJECT