Unbiased scientific reporting is crucial for synthesizing research results. Previous studies suggest that statistically significant results are more likely to be published and more likely to be submitted to high impact journals. However, to our knowledge, the most recent research on statistical significance in relation to journal impact factors in ecological research was published more than two decades ago or addresses a small subset of the literature. Here, we extract p-values from articles published in 11 journals in 2012 and 2014 with six journals sampled in both years. Our results indicate that the proportion of statistically significant results increases with rising impact factor. Such a trend can have important consequences for syntheses of ecological data and it highlights the importance of covering a wide range of impact factors when identifying published studies for data syntheses. We caution against the possible downplaying of non-significant results by either journals or authors.
Cite items from this project
3D Printing in Medicine
3D-Printed Materials and Systems
Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg