Ecological Archives E095-047-A5
Brian Hayden, Chris Harrod, Kimmo K. Kahilainen. 2014. Lake morphometry and resource polymorphism determine niche segregation between cool- and cold-water-adapted fish. Ecology 95:538–553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/13-0264.1
Appendix E. Stable-isotope mixing model values of LSR whitefish, perch, and DR whitefish.
Table E1. Estimated proportional contribution of pelagic, littoral and profundal prey to the assimilated diet of fish as calculated by the siar mixing model; modal values are presented with 95% credibility limits in parenthesis. Note that profundal habitat was absent in Lakes Kuohkima and Siilas.
Lake class
Lake
Species
n
Pelagic
Littoral
Profundal
L.Pel
L. Kilpis
LSR
50
56 (50–64)
19 (14–23)
25 (15–35)
L. Tsahkal
LSR
36
1 (0–11)
30 (15–40)
69 (57–80)
L.Lit
L. Kuohkima
LSR
50
71 (64–78)
29 (22–36)
-
L. Siilas
LSR
30
40 (29–50)
60 (50–71)
-
LP.Pel
L. Raha
LSR
96
57 (51–64)
33 (30–37)
10 (3–16)
Perch
45
18 (5–30)
54 (48–61)
28 (15–41)
L. Vuontis
LSR
50
59 (47–69)
32 (28–37)
9 (4–19)
Perch
34
25 (9–34)
72 (64 -82)
3 (0–13)
LP.Lit
L. Kivi
LSR
44
2 (0–9)
77 (67–86)
21 (10–30)
Perch
25
2 (0–8)
89 (81–96)
9 (1–16)
L. Aksu
LSR
14
27 (10 -41)
67 (53–80)
6 (0–19)
Perch
50
20 (10–27)
77 (69–84)
3 (0–10)
LPD
L. Muddus
LSR
51
4 (0–14)
72 (65–79)
24 (10 -34)
Perch
29
4 (0–13)
79 (70–89)
17 (3–27)
DR
50
31 (23–40)
38 (33–44)
31 (19–41)
L. Vastus
LSR
51
15 (5–24)
66 (60–73)
19 (8–31)
Perch
43
3 (0–9)
71 (63–79)
26 (16–35)
DR
50
27 (19–36)
49 (43–54)
24 (16–32)