Boris Chigarev ORCID 0000-0001-9903-2800 https://figshare.com/authors/Boris_Chigarev/6474086

Research Performance of Shell Scientific Publications During 2017-2019 Years. Bibliometric Analysis and Mapping

Start date of this research: 10 May 2019

Why Shell:

Royal Dutch Shell ...is one of the six oil and gas "supermajors" and the fifth-largest company in the world measured by 2018 revenues (and the largest based in Europe) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Dutch_Shell

Objectives: Mapping of bibliometric data of Shell petroleum company scientific publications during 2017-2019 years. Topic Mining and clustering.

Bibliometric and citation databases of scientific literature: OnePetro, Scopus, Web of Science

Used tools: VOSviewer - a software tool for constructing and visualizing bibliometric networks - http://www.vosviewer.com/ Bibliometrix - An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis - http://www.bibliometrix.org/ Typora - a markdown editor - https://typora.io/ Notepad++ - a free source code editor - https://notepad-plus-plus.org/ SmoothCSV - a powerful CSV file editor - https://smoothcsv.com/2/

OnePetro

Queries to OnePetro: search for affiliation:"shell" has returned 7 446 results search for affiliation:("Shell"), published between 2014 and 2019 has returned 1 633 results - all search for affiliation:("Shell"), published between 2014 and 2019 has returned 1 404 results - conference papers search for affiliation:("Shell"), published between 2014 and 2019 has returned 121 results - articles search for affiliation:("Shell") in peer reviewed articles, published between 2014 and 2019 has returned 105 results

Remark:

So we use query: affiliation:("Shell"), published between 2017 and 2019 that has returned 566 results - conference papers

VOSviewer RIS files 21980 terms, 408 meet 10 min number of occorrence 245 - 60% used for further analysis.

Table 1 Top keywords (terms) occurrences in titles and abstracts of 245 conference papers, based on file OnePetro-KW-title-abstract-245.tsv.

termoccurrencesrelevance score
model2120,3499
operation1450,3735
project1390,4065
cost1210,3174
effect1010,5207
uncertainty990,2722
parameter900,5571
management820,4577
property820,7241
facility790,5519
simulation720,633
team720,6711
operator690,5118
plan690,4208
location680,6572
range680,3892
workflow680,5142
recovery670,3656
requirement630,675
activity590,3149
history580,4232
completion570,3305
company560,5277
distribution560,6843

 

Fig. 1 Terms map based on titles and abstracts of 245 conference papers, (file OnePetro-KW-title-abstract-245.png)

Remark

5 clusters: Project-Operation-Management; Model-Parameter-Uncertainty; Recovery-Effect-Injection; Monitoring-Presentation; Kuweit

Further we'll using 3 additional filters in our queries: Model, Project and Recovery.

Table 2 Top 20 terms by occurrence weight in cluster 1

labelclusterweight/linksweight/total_link_strengthweight/occurrences
management1226,00001233,000082,0000
facility1215,00001130,000079,0000
team1217,00001166,000072,0000
operator1209,0000993,000069,0000
plan1216,00001018,000069,0000
requirement1218,0000884,000063,0000
activity1223,0000835,000059,0000
completion1208,0000829,000057,0000
company1212,0000824,000056,0000
opportunity1225,0000840,000056,0000
experience1192,0000688,000052,0000
practice1211,0000762,000051,0000
execution1205,0000761,000050,0000
life1200,0000680,000050,0000
platform1184,0000697,000049,0000
equipment1185,0000703,000048,0000
shell1199,0000713,000048,0000
asset1178,0000612,000045,0000
integrity1193,0000638,000044,0000
safety1170,0000610,000044,0000

Table 3 Top 20 terms by occurrence weight in cluster 2

labelclusterweight/linksweight/total_link_strengthweight/occurrences
uncertainty2234,00001522,000099,0000
parameter2224,00001224,000090,0000
property2217,00001131,000082,0000
simulation2199,0000938,000072,0000
range2217,0000950,000068,0000
workflow2208,0000996,000068,0000
history2217,0000891,000058,0000
distribution2203,0000798,000056,0000
interpretation2205,0000786,000055,0000
permeability2183,0000750,000054,0000
observation2215,0000734,000053,0000
prediction2201,0000670,000053,0000
function2184,0000650,000049,0000
modeling2205,0000679,000047,0000
sample2179,0000584,000047,0000
interval2194,0000669,000044,0000
log2181,0000611,000043,0000
estimation2179,0000559,000041,0000
basin2183,0000550,000040,0000
modelling2196,0000556,000039,0000

Table 4 Top 20 terms by occurrence weight in cluster 3

labelclusterweight/linksweight/total_link_strengthweight/occurrences
recovery3206,0000968,000067,0000
injection3205,0000737,000051,0000
presence3202,0000628,000047,0000
behavior3198,0000609,000045,0000
temperature3191,0000607,000045,0000
experiment3166,0000517,000043,0000
mechanism3178,0000519,000043,0000
state3173,0000372,000030,0000
concentration3140,0000376,000029,0000
concern3159,0000357,000027,0000
producer3164,0000407,000027,0000
pilot3155,0000415,000026,0000
corrosion3116,0000297,000025,0000
density3153,0000358,000025,0000
injector3164,0000414,000024,0000
stability3147,0000335,000024,0000
product3160,0000324,000023,0000
viscosity3125,0000274,000021,0000
validation3136,0000263,000020,0000
brine3118,0000220,000019,0000

Remark:

Scopus

Queries to Scopus:

AFFILORG ( shell ) AND PUBYEAR > 2016 1,662 doc

Remarks

There is no direct affiliations between Shell and Russian publications

Model, Project and Recovery are significant themes for Shell according Scopus (as well as OnePetro)

Table 5 The number of documents by type

Document typenumber of docs
Conference Paper880
Article678
Book Chapter32
Review32

Remark: Conference papers are more important for industry than articles

Table 6 The number of documents by subject areas

SUBJECT AREAnumber of docs
Earth and Planetary Sciences801
Energy667
Engineering365
Chemical Engineering177
Environmental Science167
Chemistry146
Materials Science94
Physics and Astronomy82
Mathematics62
Computer Science59
Agricultural and Biological Sciences48

More in file: Scopus-1662-Analyze-Subject.csv

Table 7 The number of documents by authors affiliations

AFFILIATIONnumber of papers
Royal Dutch Shell672
Delft University of Technology94
Shell Oil Company81
Shell International Exploration and Production Inc.79
Shell Exploration and Production Company60
Imperial College London54
Kuwait Oil Company39
Shell International Exploration and Production Inc.34
University of Oxford33
Rice University29
Texas A and M University25
Shell International Exploration and Production Inc.24
Shell Petroleum Development Company23
Shell International Exploration and Production23
University of Texas at Austin23
Utrecht University22
Technische Universiteit Eindhoven21
Petroleum Development Oman21
Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij BV21
Shell U.K. Limited20
University of Manchester20
Exxon Mobil Corporation19

More in file: Scopus-1662-Analyze-Affiliation.csv

Table 8 The number of documents by funding sponsors

Funding sponsornumber of papers
Shell63
Shell Exploration and Production Company25
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council19
Shell United States (Shell)19
U.S. Department of Energy16
National Natural Science Foundation of China15
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft14
National Science Foundation13
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek13
Government of Alberta12
Government of Canada12
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada11
Chevron9

More in file: Scopus-1662-Analyze-FundingSponsor.csv

For more information see next files on Figshare:

Made by VOSviewer:

Fig. 2 Keywords co-occurrence for 1662 papers

Fig. 3 Keywords co-occurrence overlay for 1662 papers

Fig. 4 Co-authorship - countries for Shell papers in Scopus

Table 9 Shell papers citation - organizations (more in file: All scopus-Shell citation - organizations.tsv )

organizationdocumentscitationstotal link strength
shell, united states51275
kuwait oil company, kuwait35105
shell international exploration and production inc., united states33766
shell, netherlands28104
shell exploration and production company, united states27361
shell, united kingdom26191
schlumberger, united states25162
shell international exploration and production inc, united states24396
delft university of technology, netherlands21428
shell global solutions international b.v., grasweg 31, amsterdam, 1031 hw, netherlands18295
shell global solutions international, netherlands18183
shell global solutions, united kingdom17889
shell petroleum development company, nigeria1620
sarawak shell berhad, malaysia1410
shell global solutions (us) inc., united states14274
shell global solutions, united states14217
shell international exploration and production, united states14110
shell global solutions international b.v., rijswijk, netherlands13636
halliburton, united states1250
shell global solutions international bv, netherlands12205
shell global solutions international, united states12219
shell international exploration and production inc., houston, tx, united states12584
shell global solutions international b.v., amsterdam, netherlands11542

The keywords/terms from file: All scopus-Shell KW cooccurr GML.tsv (get from All scopus-Shell KW cooccurr GML.gml by using regex)

Table 10 Top 20 terms by occurrence weight in cluster 1

labelclusterweight/linksweight/total_link_strengthweight/occurrences
seismology1245.0000956.0000143.0000
geophysical prospecting1110.0000266.000060.0000
stratigraphy1183.0000486.000058.0000
seismic waves1171.0000444.000056.0000
porosity1188.0000451.000051.0000
seismic prospecting1131.0000304.000050.0000
shale1173.0000353.000042.0000
velocity1132.0000268.000040.0000
rocks1157.0000291.000039.0000
geology1168.0000305.000037.0000
hydrocarbon reservoir1176.0000320.000037.0000
reservoirs (water)1155.0000291.000032.0000
lithology1144.0000238.000030.0000
seismic response1129.0000250.000030.0000
atlantic ocean1105.0000196.000029.0000
deformation1115.0000172.000029.0000
deposition1115.0000194.000029.0000
numerical model1104.0000160.000028.0000
shear flow1110.0000197.000028.0000
permeability1146.0000278.000027.0000

Table 11 Top 20 terms by occurrence weight in cluster 2

labelclusterweight/linksweight/total_link_strengthweight/occurrences
infill drilling2237.0000696.0000101.0000
gas industry2282.0000643.000087.0000
oil field development2194.0000516.000061.0000
cost effectiveness2188.0000415.000048.0000
digital storage2203.0000385.000048.0000
offshore oil wells2173.0000362.000048.0000
petroleum prospecting2148.0000290.000044.0000
oil fields2161.0000370.000043.0000
costs2158.0000320.000042.0000
data acquisition2158.0000318.000041.0000
offshore oil well production2169.0000286.000040.0000
surveys2123.0000229.000037.0000
decision making2137.0000236.000033.0000
greenhouse gases2128.0000280.000033.0000
reservoir management2129.0000316.000033.0000
offshore gas fields2170.0000308.000031.0000
oil and gas industry2117.0000189.000030.0000
well testing2135.0000266.000026.0000
carbon capture282.0000217.000024.0000
drills299.0000176.000024.0000

Table 12 Top 20 terms by occurrence weight in cluster 3

labelclusterweight/linksweight/total_link_strengthweight/occurrences
carbon dioxide3213.0000521.000071.0000
gasoline3186.0000405.000057.0000
efficiency3148.0000292.000043.0000
fuels364.0000222.000041.0000
carbon3170.0000332.000036.0000
engines357.0000174.000033.0000
deposits3120.0000218.000032.0000
combustion367.0000150.000026.0000
sulfur compounds3109.0000155.000024.0000
temperature3105.0000165.000023.0000
natural gas3110.0000148.000021.0000
mixtures385.0000137.000020.0000
testing375.0000104.000020.0000
direct injection334.0000113.000019.0000
friction357.000076.000019.0000
corrosion361.000089.000017.0000
engine cylinders333.0000101.000017.0000
petroleum industry389.0000127.000017.0000
software testing369.000091.000017.0000
steel corrosion344.000093.000017.0000

Table 13 Top 20 terms by occurrence weight in cluster 4

labelclusterweight/linksweight/total_link_strengthweight/occurrences
petroleum reservoir engineering4272.0000849.000098.0000
oil well flooding4259.0000896.000089.0000
gases4256.0000708.000084.0000
crude oil4209.0000619.000075.0000
enhanced recovery4192.0000566.000055.0000
water injection4184.0000466.000046.0000
porous materials4114.0000312.000044.0000
floods4155.0000387.000041.0000
injection (oil wells)4163.0000362.000038.0000
viscosity4146.0000272.000038.0000
surface active agents4131.0000301.000035.0000
well flooding4133.0000361.000034.0000
enhanced oil recovery4132.0000324.000032.0000
computational fluid dynamics4112.0000187.000028.0000
flow of fluids4119.0000229.000028.0000
liquids4114.0000180.000025.0000
numerical methods491.0000165.000025.0000
computerized tomography483.0000162.000024.0000
recovery491.0000156.000019.0000
emulsification478.0000135.000018.0000

Table 14 Top 20 terms by occurrence weight in cluster 6

labelclusterweight/linksweight/total_link_strengthweight/occurrences
article5141.0000625.000071.0000
risk assessment5225.0000564.000069.0000
priority journal5120.0000410.000043.0000
nonhuman577.0000363.000037.0000
controlled study593.0000335.000034.0000
sand5163.0000313.000031.0000
aquifers5162.0000313.000028.0000
human564.0000222.000028.0000
unclassified drug588.0000277.000024.0000
solvents597.0000173.000023.0000
chemical analysis5129.0000207.000020.0000
chemistry579.0000193.000019.0000
sensitivity analysis5114.0000156.000019.0000
humans556.0000171.000018.0000
petroleum5104.0000171.000018.0000
procedures573.0000187.000018.0000
animal548.0000197.000017.0000
animals548.0000197.000017.0000
mass spectrometry591.0000182.000017.0000
water quality595.0000166.000017.0000

Remark: ALL number of clusters = 8, we present first 5 (see "All scopus-Shell KW cooccurr GML.tsv" for more data)

Bibliometric maps for: ( AFFILORG ( shell ) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY ( model ) ) AND PUBYEAR > 2016 613 docs

Fig. 5Keywords co-occurrence for 613 papers

Fig. 6 Keywords co-occurrence overlay for 613 papers

Fig. 7 Keywords co-occurrence overlay difference for 613 papers (top 20 keywords got from 1662 docs was removed from this map)

Fig. 8 Fragment from keywords co-occurrence overlay difference for 613 papers (Seismic prospecting and Velocity model and Velocity measurement)

Bibliometric maps for: ( AFFILORG ( shell ) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY ( project* ) ) AND PUBYEAR > 2016 214 docs

Fig. 9 Keywords co-occurrence for 214 papers

Fig. 10 Keywords co-occurrence overlay for 214 papers

Fig. 11 Keywords co-occurrence overlay difference for 214 papers (top 20 keywords got from 1662 docs was removed from this map)

Fig. 12 Keywords co-occurrence difference for 214 papers (top 20 keywords got from 1662 docs was removed from this map)

Bibliometric maps for: ( AFFILORG ( shell ) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY ( recovery ) ) AND PUBYEAR > 2016 171 docs

Fig. 13 Keywords co-occurrence for 171 papers

Fig. 14 Keywords co-occurrence overlay for 171 papers

Fig. 15 Keywords co-occurrence overlay difference for 171 papers (top 20 keywords got from 1662 docs was removed from this map)

Fig. 16 Keywords co-occurrence difference for 171 papers (top 20 keywords got from 1662 docs was removed from this map)

Fig. 17 Fragment from keywords co-occurrence overlay difference for 171 papers (enhanced recovery)

Some starting experiments with Bibliometrix (http://www.bibliometrix.org/)

Common remark: using the Bibliometrix package requires a separate study

Fig. 18 Wordcloud for: ( AFFILORG ( shell ) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY ( recovery ) ) AND PUBYEAR > 2016 171 docs; file: KeywordsPlus-171-docs.PNG

Fig. 19 Wordcloud for: ( AFFILORG ( shell ) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY ( project* ) ) AND PUBYEAR > 2016 216 docs; file: KeywordsPlus-216-docs.png (newer date then for 214 docs)

Fig. 20 Wordcloud for: ( AFFILORG ( shell ) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY ( model ) ) AND PUBYEAR > 2016 614 docs; file: KeywordsPlus-614-docs.PNG (newer date then for 613 docs)

Three Fields Plot: Visualize the main items of three fields (Keywords-KeywordsPlus-Affiliations), and how they are related through a Sankey diagram

Fig. 21 file: ( AFFILORG ( shell ) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY ( recovery ) ) AND PUBYEAR > 2016 171 docs; Three-Fields Plot Keywords-KeywordsPlus-Affiliations-171-docs.png

Fig. 22 ( AFFILORG ( shell ) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY ( project* ) ) AND PUBYEAR > 2016 216 docs; file: Three-Fields Plot Keywords-KeywordsPlus-Affiliations-216-docs.png (newer date then for 214 docs)

Fig. 23 ( AFFILORG ( shell ) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY ( model ) ) AND PUBYEAR > 2016 614 docs;file: Three-Fields Plot Keywords-KeywordsPlus-Affiliations-614-docs.png (newer date then for 613 docs)

Co-Word Analysis: The conceptual structure of a field, method: Multidimensional Scaling (MDS)

Fig. 24 ( AFFILORG ( shell ) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY ( recovery ) ) AND PUBYEAR > 2016 171 docs; file: Factorial Analysis MDS 171 docs.png

Fig. 25 ( AFFILORG ( shell ) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY ( project* ) ) AND PUBYEAR > 2016 216 docs; file: Factorial Analysis MDS 216 docs.png (newer date then for 214 docs)

Fig. 26 ( AFFILORG ( shell ) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY ( model ) ) AND PUBYEAR > 2016 614 docs; file: Factorial Analysis MDS 614 docs.png (newer date then for 613 docs)

Remark: for future research: data preparation and choice of parameters need more attentions to get informative figs


References:

Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017) bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis, Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), pp 959-975, Elsevier.

Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.

Boris Chigarev ORCID 0000-0001-9903-2800 https://figshare.com/authors/Boris_Chigarev/6474086 direct link: https://figshare.com/s/fce57c22704720db83b4