Supplementary material from "State-dependent judgement bias in <i>Drosophila</i>: evidence for evolutionarily primitive affective processes"

Published on 2018-02-27T04:40:23Z (GMT) by
Affective states influence decision-making under ambiguity in humans and other animals. Individuals in a negative state tend to interpret ambiguous cues more negatively than individuals in a positive state. We demonstrate that the fruit fly, <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>, also exhibits state-dependent changes in cue interpretation. <i>Drosophila</i> were trained on a Go/Go task to approach a positive (P) odour associated with a sugar reward and actively avoid a negative (N) odour associated with shock. Trained flies were then either shaken to induce a purported negative state or left undisturbed (control), and given a choice between: air or P; air or N; air or ambiguous odour (1 : 1 blend of P : N). Shaken flies were significantly less likely to approach the ambiguous odour than control flies. This ‘judgement bias’ may be mediated by changes in neural activity that reflect evolutionarily primitive affective states. We cannot say whether such states are consciously experienced, but use of this model organism's versatile experimental tool kit may facilitate elucidation of their neural and genetic basis.

Cite this collection

Deakin, Amanda; Mendl, Michael; J. Browne, William; S. Paul, Elizabeth; J. L. Hodge, James (2018): Supplementary material from "State-dependent judgement bias in Drosophila: evidence for evolutionarily primitive affective processes". The Royal Society. Collection.