figshare
Browse
Table_4.xls (5.5 kB)

Diagnostic performance of antigen detection by the urine O. viverrini Excretory Secretory (OV-ES) assay compared with the gold standard formalin ethyl-acetate concentration technique (FECT) in field-collected samples (n = 235) and the odds on predicting opisthorchiasis by urinary antigen detection using urine OV-ES assay.

Download (0 kB)
dataset
posted on 2015-10-20, 04:44 authored by Chanika Worasith, Christine Kamamia, Anna Yakovleva, Kunyarat Duenngai, Chompunoot Wangboon, Jiraporn Sithithaworn, Nattaya Watwiengkam, Nisana Namwat, Anchalee Techasen, Watcharin Loilome, Puangrat Yongvanit, Alex Loukas, Paiboon Sithithaworn, Jeffrey M. Bethony

*AUC refers to the area under the Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

°Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV) and Likelihood Ratios (LR) were estimated using 53% prevalence rate of OV.

The term LR+ refers to the likelihood of observing a positive test result in patients with OV;

LR- refers to the likelihood, after subtracting from 1, of observing a negative test result with individuals without OV infection

Diagnostic performance of antigen detection by the urine O. viverrini Excretory Secretory (OV-ES) assay compared with the gold standard formalin ethyl-acetate concentration technique (FECT) in field-collected samples (n = 235) and the odds on predicting opisthorchiasis by urinary antigen detection using urine OV-ES assay.

History