Paper Pdf

The utilization of psychiatric diagnostic tools to suppress critics constitutes a multi-layered violation of professional ethics, human rights, and scientific integrity. This practice not only infringes upon fundamental freedoms but also erodes public trust in healthcare systems and academic institutions through the deliberate distortion of clinical concepts. By examining legal frameworks, social impacts, and patterns of institutional corruption, this analysis demonstrates how the weaponization of psychiatry simultaneously fuels systemic repression and undermines individual rights and collective mental health.

1.2 Violation of Principles of Medical Ethics Modern psychiatry operates under the stringent guidelines of the "World Medical Association's International Code of Medical Ethics," which mandates two non-negotiable conditions : > > Independent clinical assessments by impartial specialists and >> Voluntary informed consent from patients Any diagnostic process influenced by external pressures—whether political, economic, social, and/or judicial—represents a blatant violation of the Hippocratic principle of Primum non nocere ("first, do no harm").