Comparative Analysis Between John Onimisi Obidi’s Theory of Entropicity (ToE) and Waldemar Marek Feldt’s FELDT–HIGGS Universal Bridge (F–HUB) Theory: From Information Fields to Entropic Dynamics: Evaluating Competing Foundations for a Post-Einsteinian Physics in Our Understanding of Nature and Reality

<p dir="ltr">The great Einstein revealed that the constancy of light defines the very architecture of spacetime. In our age, two successors to that vision—John Onimisi Obidi’s <b>Theory of Entropicity (ToE)</b> and Waldemar Marek Feldt’s <b>FELDT–HIGGS Universal Bridge (F–HUB)</b>—push this frontier deeper, each seeking to uncover what light itself is truly made of. Where Einstein’s relativity enshrined cc as a universal postulate, ToE reinterprets it as a consequence: the finite rate at which entropy can reconfigure reality. The universe does not merely move through spacetime; it reorganizes itself through the flow of entropy. In this view, time dilation, length contraction, and mass increase are no longer geometric curiosities but inevitable responses of the entropic field to its own conservation and redistribution.</p><p dir="ltr">By contrast, F–HUB reveals another facet of the cosmic code: that information, interacting with the Higgs field, crystallizes into mass and gravity. It portrays a universe built from structured information, while ToE portrays one animated by the flux of entropy. Between them lies the bridge from structure to becoming, from the geometry of information to the dynamics of entropy—the bridge between what the universe <i>is</i> and how it <i>becomes</i>. Together, these two frameworks whisper a deeper truth: the constant of light is the speed of knowing—the ultimate rate at which the universe can rediscover itself through entropy and information. What Einstein began with geometry, ToE and F–HUB continue with causation, reminding us that the universe is not a machine but a living computation—an evolving harmony between the freedom of entropy and the memory of information.</p><p dir="ltr">In the unfolding landscape of twenty‑first‑century theoretical physics, the pursuit of a unified description of nature remains among the most profound challenges. This study presents a detailed comparative analysis between two emerging frameworks—Obidi’s Theory of Entropicity and Feldt’s FELDT–HIGGS Universal Bridge—each offering a novel reinterpretation of mass, gravity, entropy, and information. ToE establishes entropy not as a statistical by‑product of disorder but as the fundamental field and causal substrate of physical reality, reconstructing gravitation, time, and quantum behavior from the dynamics of an entropy field governed by the <b>Obidi Action</b> and the <b>Vuli‑Ndlela Integral</b>. Conversely, F–HUB formulates an informational architecture of the universe in which mass and spacetime emerge from quantum information structuring mediated by the Higgs field. Its central relation, the <b>F–HUB Master Equation</b>, integrates thermodynamic constants to link information, mass, and entropy within a unified algebraic framework.</p><p dir="ltr">This comparative analysis systematically explores the philosophical premises, mathematical foundations, and physical implications of both theories, while examining whether F–HUB’s informational emergence model can be interpreted as a subset or limiting case of ToE’s entropic dynamics. By contrasting the causality orders—F–HUB: Information → Entropy → Mass → Gravity → Spacetime, and ToE: Entropy → Information → Mass → Motion → Spacetime—the paper argues that ToE provides a deeper, first‑principles formulation of physical law in which entropy is the generative field underlying information and structure. Taken together, these frameworks signal a paradigm shift toward post‑Einsteinian physics grounded not in geometry, but in informational–entropic causation.</p>