legal research- Asylum in the United States of America.pdf

This research provides an in-depth analysis of the U.S. asylum system, focusing on its legal foundations, processes, and challenges. It explores the five primary grounds for asylum claims—race, religion, nationality, political opinion, and membership in a particular social group—as defined under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and influenced by landmark judicial decisions. By examining legal precedents such as INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca and Matter of Acosta, the study highlights the evolving interpretation of asylum eligibility and procedural requirements. The research also identifies systemic challenges, including procedural delays and inconsistencies, and proposes reforms to enhance efficiency and fairness in asylum adjudication. Key recommendations include the introduction of centralized case management systems, improved access to legal representation, and the application of trauma-informed practices during asylum interviews. This study underscores the critical role of the U.S. asylum system in safeguarding human rights and offers practical solutions to address the complexities faced by applicants and adjudicators.