Video_1_Rab10-Positive Tubular Structures Represent a Novel Endocytic Pathway That Diverges From Canonical Macropinocytosis in RAW264 Macrophages.mp4
Using the optogenetic photo-manipulation of photoactivatable (PA)-Rac1, remarkable cell surface ruffling and the formation of a macropinocytic cup (premacropinosome) could be induced in the region of RAW264 macrophages irradiated with blue light due to the activation of PA-Rac1. However, the completion of macropinosome formation did not occur until Rac1 was deactivated by the removal of the light stimulus. Following PA-Rac1 deactivation, some premacropinosomes closed into intracellular macropinosomes, whereas many others transformed into long Rab10-positive tubules without forming typical macropinosomes. These Rab10-positive tubules moved centripetally towards the perinuclear Golgi region along microtubules. Surprisingly, these Rab10-positive tubules did not contain any endosome/lysosome compartment markers, such as Rab5, Rab7, or LAMP1, suggesting that the Rab10-positive tubules were not part of the degradation pathway for lysosomes. These Rab10-positive tubules were distinct from recycling endosomal compartments, which are labeled with Rab4, Rab11, or SNX1. These findings suggested that these Rab10-positive tubules may be a part of non-degradative endocytic pathway that has never been known. The formation of Rab10-positive tubules from premacropinosomes was also observed in control and phorbol myristate acetate (PMA)-stimulated macrophages, although their frequencies were low. Interestingly, the formation of Rab10-positive premacropinosomes and tubules was not inhibited by phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors, while the classical macropinosome formation requires PI3K activity. Thus, this study provides evidence to support the existence of Rab10-positive tubules as a novel endocytic pathway that diverges from canonical macropinocytosis.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0962-8924%2800%2989101-1
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.00878.x
- https://doi.org//10.1084/jem.182.2.389
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nature12138
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fphys.2015.00277
- https://doi.org//10.1038/ncb0509-510
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.02.012
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fphys.2014.00374
- https://doi.org//10.1038/srep02385
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nrm2728
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nrm1500
- https://doi.org//10.1091/mbc.E05-08-0799
- https://doi.org//10.1002/jcp.26503
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cmet.2007.03.001
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.1205278109
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.1009428107
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.01013.x
- https://doi.org//10.1242/jcs.226977
- https://doi.org//10.15252/embj.2020104862
- https://doi.org//10.1093/jmicro/dfu003
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nature08241
- https://doi.org//10.1091/mbc.E10-02-0149
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pgen.1006093
- https://doi.org//10.15252/embj.201489703
- https://doi.org//10.4161/cib.3.2.10845
- https://doi.org//10.1091/mbc.E09-06-0535
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0092-8674%2803%2900118-1
- https://doi.org//10.1038/35052055
- https://doi.org//10.1111/febs.14115
- https://doi.org//10.1242/jcs.03167
- https://doi.org//10.1242/bio.20122204
- https://doi.org//10.1267/ahc.20-00006
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.274.3.1240
- https://doi.org//10.1083/jcb.135.5.1249
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nrm2755
- https://doi.org//10.1083/jcb.201811014
- https://doi.org//10.1083/jcb.201111091
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.M116.766337
- https://doi.org//10.1098/rstb.2018.0151
- https://doi.org//10.1242/jcs.053207
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
- Transplantation Immunology
- Tumour Immunology
- Immunology not elsewhere classified
- Immunology
- Veterinary Immunology
- Animal Immunology
- Genetic Immunology
- Applied Immunology (incl. Antibody Engineering, Xenotransplantation and T-cell Therapies)
- Autoimmunity
- Cellular Immunology
- Humoural Immunology and Immunochemistry
- Immunogenetics (incl. Genetic Immunology)
- Innate Immunity