posted on 2016-04-27, 20:04authored byThomas G. Martin, Andreas Boland, Anthony W. P. Fitzpatrick, Sjors H. W. Scheres
<p>Today one of the biggest challenges in
cryo-EM is grid preparation. Common difficulties lie in ice thickness, too high
or too low particle numbers, particle aggregation and a preferred orientation
of the particles. In many cases a
support layer can be of use. For large proteins like ribosomes an amorphous
carbon support layer has proven useful<sup><b>1</b></sup>.
But for small proteins amorphous carbon is not an option due to its high
background noise in combination with the already low contrast of the protein.
Often the contrast is reduced to a point where alignment is no longer possible.</p>
<p>Graphene based support layers are an
attractive alternative. They offer similar advantages like amorphous carbon
while being almost electron transparent. While the preparation of pure graphene
supports can be time consuming, they have been shown to work<sup><b>2</b></sup>. Graphene itself is hydrophobic but through a
treatment with hydrogen plasma it is possible to make it hydrophilic and
increase particle absorption on the grid<sup><b>2</b></sup>. An alternative graphene based
support is graphene oxide, which is hydrophilic on its own<sup><b>3</b></sup>. Graphene-oxide
is commercially available as solubilized flakes in sizes ranging from less than
0.5 µm to bigger than 50µm. This allows for a simple grid preparation in a few
minutes without expensive equipment.</p>
<p>Areas of criticism are a slight decrease in
the electron transparency compared to graphene and a variance in support layer
thickness due to the possible deposition of multiple layers of flakes in a
random manner. While the decrease in the electron transparency of single sheet
graphene oxide compared to single sheet graphen is not relevant in most cases
it is necessary to reduce the deposition of multiple flakes on top of each
other, which will affect the image quality. Therefore it is critical to
optimize graphene oxide preparation conditions and protocols. We started out
with the protocol suggested in <sup><b>3</b></sup> and adapted it to a point where we are able
to obtain mostly uniform deposition of graphene oxide flakes, resulting in
mainly monolayer and bilayer areas with minimal amounts of empty holes or
multiple-layer flake depositions (see end of the video for examples).</p>
<p>We identified that the type of grid, glow
discharge conditions, graphene oxide flake size and concentration and
deposition time all play a role in the final outcome. Additionally, a crucial
step in the preparation procedure was the extensive washing of the grids
directly post graphene oxide deposition. For us, it was possible to adjust for
different grids by adjusting the glow discharge conditions while keeping all
other parameters the same.</p><p>We have successfully applied this protocol of Graphene Oxide grids in several projects <sup>4</sup>.</p>
<p><br></p><p>References:</p><p><sup><b>1</b></sup> R.M. Voorhees, I.S. Fernandez, S.H.W. Scheres & R.S. Hegde (2014). Structure of the mammalian ribosome-Sec61 complex to 3.4 Angstrom resolution". <i>Cell</i>, 157, 1632-1643.</p><p><sup><b>2</b></sup> C.J. Russo & L.A. Passmore (2014). Robust evaluation of 3D electron cryomicroscopy data using tilt-pairs. <i>J Str Biol,</i> 187, 112-118.</p><p><sup><b>3</b></sup> R.S. Pantelic, J.C. Meyer, U. Kaiser, W.Baumeister, & J.M. Plitzko (2010). Graphene oxide: a substrate for optimizing preparations of frozen-hydrated samples. <i>Journal of structural biology</i>, 170(1), 152-156.</p><p><sup><b>4 </b></sup>A. Boland, T.G. Martin, Z. Zhang, J. Yang, X.-C. Bai , L. Chang, S.H.W. Scheres, D. Barford (2017). Cryo-EM structure of a metazoan separase-securin complex at near-atomic resolution. <i>Nat Struct Mol Biol.,</i> 24(4):414-418<br><br></p><p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Protocol:</p>
<p>Materials: GO Solution Sigma; ddH<sub>2</sub>0; Tweezers (Dumont N5AC); Pipette (3µl and 20µl); Tabletop centrifuge; Parafilm; Whatman
filter paper No1</p>
<p>1. Dilute GO solution 10x to 0.2mg/mL with
ddH<sub>2</sub>0</p><p>2.
Spin for 15 seconds at approximately 300 rcf to remove aggregates</p>
<p>3. Glow discharge grids with carbon side
up (Quanitfoil Au 300 R1.2/1.3 1minute at 0.2mBar and 40mA; Quanitfoil Cu 300 R1.2/1.3 60 seconds at 0.2mBar
and 30mA)</p>
<p>4. Prepare a flat and clean working area
(e.g. with parafilm)</p>
<p>5. Prepare 3x 20µl drops of ddH20 for each grid you
want to prepare</p>
<p>6. Take up grids with anti-capillary
tweezers</p>
<p>7. Place 3µl of the diluted GO solution (1)
on the carbon side of the grid</p>
<p>8. Incubate for 1 minute</p>
<p>9. Remove solution with filter paper. </p>
<p>10. Take up first drop of ddH20 with the carbon side
and remove it with the filter paper.</p>
<p>11. Same for the second drop.</p>
<p>12. Take up third drop of ddH20 with the back side
of the grid.</p>
<p>13. Dry for 5 minutes</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Here are some glow discharge conditions
that worked in the past for Quantifoil grids. As said before these conditions
vary between grids :</p>
<p>Edwards Sputter Coater S150B: 0.2mBar, 40mA, 60 seconds (Au 300 R1.2/1.3)</p>
<p>Edwards
Sputter Coater S150B: 0.2mBar, 30mA,
60 seconds (Cu 300 R1.2/1.3)</p>
<p>K100X Glow Discharge System: 0.2mBar, 50mA, 75 seconds </p>
<p><br></p>
<p><br></p>
Funding
Medical Research Council, EMBO Fellowship & Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellowship