posted on 2019-10-28, 15:36authored byShu-Yuan Pan, Andrew Z. Haddad, Ashok J. Gadgil
The
bauxite-derived adsorbent, activated alumina (AA), has a current
annual global market of over 600 million USD, and of this, more than
one-third of AA is used for defluoridation of fluoride-bearing water.
The commonly used Bayer process for production of AA suffers from
thermodynamic inefficiency, thereby raising costs, and also causes
significant environmental damage. Here, we evaluate three other bauxite-derived
adsorbents as alternatives to AA for water defluoridation: mildly
processed bauxite, thermally activated bauxite, and acid-treated thermally
activated bauxite (ATAB). We first determine the energy intensity
and resource efficiency of these three new adsorbents throughout their
(future, anticipated) manufacturing processes and compare their defluoridation
performance in the laboratory. Then, we quantify the carbon footprints
of the three adsorbents via the product life-cycle approach, from
their manufacturing to their applications in defluoridation. The results
reveal that these three adsorbents exhibit less energy intensity and
higher resource efficiency, thereby lowering their carbon footprints
by 2–20×, relative to an equivalent amount of AA. We also
estimate the operating costs of manufacturing and potential revenues
from carbon offsets for each of the three adsorbents. Replacement
of about 33 000 tonnes per year of AA currently used for wastewater
treatment with equivalent ATAB could annually reduce annual manufacturing
costs by 4.7 million USD and additionally generate 79 200 tonnes
CO2 offsets. This study supports decision-making on selecting
a greener and more sustainable approach for wastewater defluoridation.