figshare
Browse

The germ cell specific markers ZPBP2 and PGK2 in testicular biopsies can predict the  presence as well as the quality of sperm in non-obstructive azoospermia patients

Download (1.32 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-07-18, 13:42 authored by Nasrin Ghanami GashtiNasrin Ghanami Gashti, Mohammad Ali Sadighi Gilani, Ayob Jabari, Maryam Qasem, Narjes Feizollahi, Mehdi Abbasi

To assess the role of three testis-specific genes including ZPBP2, PGK2, and ACRV1 in the prediction of sperm retrieval result and quality of retrieved sperm by microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients. This was a case-control study including 57 testicular samples of NOA patients including 32 patients with successful sperm retrieval (NOA+) and 25 patients with failed sperm retrieval (NOA-), and 9 samples of men with normal spermatogenesis in the testes as the positive control (OA). We investigated the expression of candidate genes by RT-qPCR and germ cell population patterns by DNA flow cytometry in testicular biopsy samples. The association between PGK2 expressions with the quality of retrieved spermatozoa was also evaluated. The RT-qPCR data revealed a significantly higher expression of ZPBP2 and PGK2 in the NOA+ in comparison to NOA- group (P = 0.002, and P = 0.002, respectively). Flow cytometry results revealed that the haploid cell percentage was significantly higher in NOA+ vs. NOA- group (P = 0.0001). In samples with a higher percentage of haploid cells, expression levels of ZPBP2 and PGK2 were higher (P = 0.001). The PGK2 expression was significantly associated with retrieved sperm quality (P = 0.01). Our results contribute to the search for the biomarkers for predicting the presence of testicular sperm and would be useful to avoid unnecessary multiple micro-TESE. Overall, the expression pattern of the ZPBP2 and PGK2 may be useful in predicting sperm recovery success and quality of retrieved sperm in NOA patients.

History

Publication

Reproductive Sciences, 2021, 28, pp.1466–1475

Publisher

Springer

Rights

This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-020-00427-9 Use of this Accepted Version is subject to the publisher’s Accepted Manuscript terms of use https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/accepted-manuscript-terms

Department or School

  • School of Engineering

Usage metrics

    University of Limerick

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC