A reappraisal of primary sources suggests that
the copperas industry in Dorset and south-west Hampshire became
well-established somewhat earlier than is commonly thought, and continued later
and with steadier success than is generally appreciated. While there are lengthy
accounts of the history of the Dorset works and good ones of copperas production more generally, writers have historically
tended to dwell on the spectacular financial losses of two particular rival courtly
speculators, and have failed to note the geographical limits of the evidence
arising from their disputes. Recent investigations have focussed on interesting
but necessarily localised archaeological evidence, and have in some cases relied
on auto-affirming circular arguments from secondary sources. Incorrect dating
of primary sources, particularly among the State Papers, although usually noted
to be approximate, appears to have seriously impeded the chronological analysis
of the industry, while in one instance acceptance of a partisan contemporary
source has exaggerated threefold the claimed value of the industry at one point
in time, hinting mistakenly at a volatility simply not evident in other sources.
This article relates evidence that so-called ‘alum’
was collected and, more significantly, manufactured on the Hampshire
coast in the fifteenth century, demonstrates early problems with the emerging
system of monopolies, and identifies the locations of three copperas
manufactories established in the district before 1565. The invaluable evidence
collected from the Exchequer Port Books was greatly facilitated by a new document
digitisation and transcription project.