Supplementary Methods and Results from Taxonomic similarity does not predict necessary sample size for ex situ conservation: a comparison among five genera

Hoban, Sean; Callicrate, Taylor; Clark, John; Deans, Susan; Dosmann, Michael; Fant, Jeremie; Gailing, Oliver; Havens, Kayri; Hipp, Andrew L.; Kadav, Priyanka; Kramer, Andrea T.; Lobdell, Matthew; Magellan, Tracy; Meyer, Abby; Pooler, Margaret; Spence, Emma; Thompson, Patrick; Toppila, Raakel; Walsh, Seana; Westwood, Murphy; Wood, Jordan; Griffith, M. Patrick

doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12128829.v1

Supplementary Methods and Results from Taxonomic similarity does not predict necessary sample size for ex situ conservation: a comparison among five genera

journal contribution

posted on 2020-04-15, 05:52 authored by Sean Hoban, Taylor Callicrate, John Clark, Susan Deans, Michael Dosmann, Jeremie Fant, Oliver Gailing, Kayri Havens, Andrew L. Hipp, Priyanka Kadav, Andrea T. Kramer, Matthew Lobdell, Tracy Magellan, Abby Meyer, Margaret Pooler, Emma Spence, Patrick Thompson, Raakel Toppila, Seana Walsh, Murphy Westwood, Jordan Wood, M. Patrick Griffith

This file contiains Supplemental Materials (introduction to the species, list of participating gardens, field and lab work for all species, and Supplementary Results including additional figures)

History

Usage metrics

Keywords

genetic diversity botanic gardens conservation planning seed banks ex situ conservation trees

Licence

CC BY 4.0

Supplementary Methods and Results from Taxonomic similarity does not predict necessary sample size for ex situ conservation: a comparison among five genera

History

Usage metrics

Categories

Keywords

Licence

Exports