Special Relativity: Scientific or Philosophical Theory?

journal contribution

posted on 2016-10-02, 08:35 authored by Taha SochiTaha Sochi

/* Layout-provided Styles */ div.standard { margin-bottom: 2ex; }

In this article, we argue that the theory of special relativity, as formulated by Einstein, is a philosophical rather than a scientific theory. What is scientific and experimentally supported is the formalism of the relativistic mechanics embedded in the Lorentz transformations and their direct mathematical, experimental and observational consequences. This is in parallel with the quantum mechanics where the scientific content and experimental support of this branch of physics is embedded in the formalism of quantum mechanics and not in its philosophical interpretations such as the Copenhagen school or the parallel worlds explanations. Einstein theory of special relativity gets unduly credit from the success of the relativistic mechanics of Lorentz transformations. Hence, all the postulates and consequences of Einstein interpretation which have no direct experimental or observational support should be reexamined and the relativistic mechanics of Lorentz transformations should be treated in education, academia and research in a similar fashion to that of quantum mechanics.

History

Usage metrics

Categories

Astronomical sciences not elsewhere classified

Keywords

Special relativity Einstein theory Lorentz transformations relativistic mechanics Special Relativity

Licence

Exports