Paradox of Proof by Lehti

The Paradox of Proof examines the inherent contradiction in dismissive responses to claims deemed unprovable or impossible without supporting evidence. This highlights how a responder’s rejection of a claim, based solely on perception, unfolds in three stages: asserting doubt with certainty, transferring the burden of proof, and maintaining certainty without substantiation. This paradox reveals a logical inconsistency where the responder assumes insight into what they declare unknowable, ultimately challenging the coherence of asserting certainty on an unsupported basis. Lehti uses examples, including skepticism around historical events, to demonstrate how unaddressed doubts can persist and hinder genuine inquiry, emphasizing the importance of transparency in fostering true understanding.