posted on 2006-12-27, 00:00authored byDavid M. Tellers, J. Christopher McWilliams, Guy Humphrey, Michel Journet, Lisa DiMichele, Joseph Hinksmon, Arlene E. McKeown, Thorsten Rosner, Yongkui Sun, Richard D. Tillyer
Ruthenium complexes employing axially chiral ligands were found to be effective asymmetric
hydrogenation catalysts for the reduction of α,β-unsaturated ene acid 1-E to give 2, a prostaglandin D2
(PGD2) receptor antagonist. With [(S-BINAP)Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 (3, S-BINAP = (S)-(+)-2,2‘-bis(diphenylphospino)-1,1‘-binapthyl), it was discovered that low hydrogen pressures (<30 psi) were essential to
achieve high enantioselectivities (92% ee). A detailed mechanistic study was undertaken to elucidate this
pressure dependence. It was determined that compound 1-E is in a ruthenium-catalyzed equilibrium with
endocylic isomer 1-Endo and in photochemical equilibrium with Z isomer 1-Z. Each isomer could be
hydrogenated to give 2, albeit with different rates and enantioselectivities. Hydrogenation of 1-Endo with
3 was found to give 2 in high enantiomeric excess, regardless of pressure and at a rate substantially faster
than that of hydrogenation of 1-E and 1-Z. In contrast, isomers 1-E and 1-Z exhibited pressure-dependent
enantioselectivities, with higher enantiomeric excesses obtained at lower pressures. A rationale for this
pressure dependence is described. Deuterium labeling studies with 1-Endo and tiglic acid were used to
elucidate the mechanism of hydride insertion and product release from ruthenium. Under neutral conditions,
protonolysis was the major pathway for metal−carbon cleavage, while under basic conditions, hydrogenolysis
of the metal−carbon bond was predominant.