posted on 2022-01-27, 12:52authored byConor G. McAloon, Patrick Wall, Francis Butler, Mary Codd, Eamonn Gormley, Cathal Dominic Walsh, Jim Duggan, Brendan T. Murphy, Philip Nolan, Breda Smyth, Katie O'Brien, Conor Teljeur, Martin J. Green, Luke O'Grady, Kieran Culhane, Claire Buckley, Ciara Carroll, Sarah Doyle, Jennifer Martin, Simon J. More
Background: Contact tracing is conducted with the primary purpose of interrupting transmission from individuals
who are likely to be infectious to others. Secondary analyses of data on the numbers of close contacts of confirmed
cases could also: provide an early signal of increases in contact patterns that might precede larger than expected case
numbers; evaluate the impact of government interventions on the number of contacts of confirmed cases; or provide
data information on contact rates between age cohorts for the purpose of epidemiological modelling. We analysed
data from 140,204 close contacts of 39,861 cases in Ireland from 1st May to 1st December 2020.
Results: Negative binomial regression models highlighted greater numbers of contacts within specific population
demographics, after correcting for temporal associations. Separate segmented regression models of the number of
cases over time and the average number of contacts per case indicated that a breakpoint indicating a rapid decrease
in the number of contacts per case in October 2020 preceded a breakpoint indicating a reduction in the number of
cases by 11 days.
Conclusions: We found that the number of contacts per infected case was overdispersed, the mean varied considerable over time and was temporally associated with government interventions. Analysis of the reported number of
contacts per individual in contact tracing data may be a useful early indicator of changes in behaviour in response
to, or indeed despite, government restrictions. This study provides useful information for triangulating assumptions
regarding the contact mixing rates between different age cohorts for epidemiological modelling.