Heat maps to show the relative mention of different features of compliance by ethnicity, disability and region.

Tables a-e provide a ‘big picture’ quantitative content analysis of compliance by ethnic group, disability category and site, and comparison with non-core participants (the sensitivity analysis). The ‘unit of analysis’ is individual people. In other words, the data represent the proportion of people in each ethnic, disability, or regional group (the rows) for whom each feature (i.e. column label) was true. Percentages are rounded to two significant figures. Low percentages for a theme may simply indicate lack of response, therefore these tables are only indicative of the distribution of responses across groups. However sample sizes were sufficiently large to have some confidence in findings. Tables are Excel-generated ‘heat maps’, with blue shades representing low percentages and red high ones. Where percentages are low, we emphasise this in the associated paper or more commonly do not comment on that particular feature for that particular group.

(DOCX)