posted on 2017-02-10, 18:34authored byAthanasios Zavras, Hossein Ghari, Alireza Ariafard, Allan J. Canty, Richard A. J. O’Hair
Gas-phase reactivity
of the copper hydride anions [CuH2]– and [Cu2H3]– toward a range of neutral reagents has been examined via multistage
mass spectrometry experiments in a linear ion trap mass spectrometer
in conjunction with isotope labeling studies and Density Functional
Theory (DFT) calculations. [CuH2]– is more reactive than [Cu2H3]–, consistent with DFT calculations, which show
it has a higher energy HOMO. Experimentally, [CuH2]– was found to react with CS2 via hydride transfer to give thioformate (HCS2–) in competition with the formation of the organometallic
[CuCS2]– ion via liberation
of hydrogen; CO2 via insertion to produce [HCuO2CH]–; methyl iodide and allyl iodide
to give I– and [CuHI]–; and 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol and 1-butanethiol via protonation
to give hydrogen and the product anions [CuH(OCH2CF3)]− and [CuH(SBu)]−. In
contrast, the weaker acid methanol was found to be unreactive. DFT
calculations reveal that the differences in reactivity between CS2 and CO2 are due to the lower lying π* orbital
of the former, which allows it to accept electron density from the
Cu center to form the initial three-membered ring complex intermediate,
[H2Cu(η2-CS2)]−. In contrast, CO2 undergoes the barrierless side-on hydride
transfer promoted by the high electronegativity of the oxygen atoms.
Side-on SN2 mechanisms for reactions of [CuH2]– with methyl iodide and allyl iodide
are favored on the basis of DFT calculations. Finally, the DFT calculated
barriers for protonation of [CuH2]– by methanol, 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol, and 1-butanethiol correlate
with their gas-phase acidities, suggesting that reactivity is mainly
controlled by the acidity of the substrate.