figshare
Browse

Gas-Phase Ion–Molecule Reactions of Copper Hydride Anions [CuH2] and [Cu2H3]

Download (2.13 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2017-02-10, 18:34 authored by Athanasios Zavras, Hossein Ghari, Alireza Ariafard, Allan J. Canty, Richard A. J. O’Hair
Gas-phase reactivity of the copper hydride anions [CuH2] and [Cu2H3] toward a range of neutral reagents has been examined via multistage mass spectrometry experiments in a linear ion trap mass spectrometer in conjunction with isotope labeling studies and Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations. [CuH2] is more reactive than [Cu2H3], consistent with DFT calculations, which show it has a higher energy HOMO. Experimentally, [CuH2] was found to react with CS2 via hydride transfer to give thioformate (HCS2) in competition with the formation of the organometallic [CuCS2] ion via liberation of hydrogen; CO2 via insertion to produce [HCuO2CH]; methyl iodide and allyl iodide to give I and [CuHI]; and 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol and 1-butanethiol via protonation to give hydrogen and the product anions [CuH­(OCH2CF3)] and [CuH­(SBu)]. In contrast, the weaker acid methanol was found to be unreactive. DFT calculations reveal that the differences in reactivity between CS2 and CO2 are due to the lower lying π* orbital of the former, which allows it to accept electron density from the Cu center to form the initial three-membered ring complex intermediate, [H2Cu­(η2-CS2)]. In contrast, CO2 undergoes the barrierless side-on hydride transfer promoted by the high electronegativity of the oxygen atoms. Side-on SN2 mechanisms for reactions of [CuH2] with methyl iodide and allyl iodide are favored on the basis of DFT calculations. Finally, the DFT calculated barriers for protonation of [CuH2] by methanol, 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol, and 1-butanethiol correlate with their gas-phase acidities, suggesting that reactivity is mainly controlled by the acidity of the substrate.

History