figshare
Browse
rsos200566_si_001.pdf (203.71 kB)

Electronic supplementary material from Are replication rates the same across academic fields? Community forecasts from the DARPA SCORE program.

Download (203.71 kB)
Version 2 2020-10-13, 14:23
Version 1 2020-07-11, 16:28
journal contribution
posted on 2020-07-14, 08:06 authored by Michael Gordon, Domenico Viganola, Michael Bishop, Yiling Chen, Anna Dreber, Brandon Goldfedder, Felix Holzmeister, Magnus Johannesson, Yang Liu, Charles Twardy, Juntao Wang, Thomas Pfeiffer
The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) programme ‘Systematizing Confidence in Open Research and Evidence' (SCORE) aims to generate confidence scores for a large number of research claims from empirical studies in the social and behavioural sciences. The confidence scores will provide a quantitative assessment of how likely a claim will hold up in an independent replication. To create the scores, we follow earlier approaches and use prediction markets and surveys to forecast replication outcomes. Based on an initial set of forecasts for the overall replication rate in SCORE and its dependence on the academic discipline and the time of publication, we show that participants expect replication rates to increase over time. Moreover, they expect replication rates to differ between fields, with the highest replication rate in economics (average survey response 58%), and the lowest in psychology and in education (average survey response of 42% for both fields). These results reveal insights into the academic community's views of the replication crisis, including for research fields for which no large-scale replication studies have been undertaken yet.

History

Usage metrics

    Royal Society Open Science

    Categories

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC