Effectiveness of trained versus untrained labor companion.

Jayasundara, D. M. C. S.; Jayawardane, I. A.; Weliange, S. D. S.; Jayasingha, T. D. K. M.; Madugalle, T. M. S. S. B.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0298852.s001

Effectiveness of trained versus untrained labor companion.

journal contribution

posted on 2024-07-23, 17:29 authored by D. M. C. S. Jayasundara, I. A. Jayawardane, S. D. S. Weliange, T. D. K. M. Jayasingha, T. M. S. S. B. Madugalle

Effectiveness of trained versus untrained labor companion.

History

Usage metrics

Keywords

randomized controlled trials minute apgar score ictrp ), clinicaltrials funnel plots gauged 40 ), respectively pooled effect sizes trained versus untrained studies systematically assessing potentially enhancing maternal calculate risk ratios automated tool rayyan physiological labor process random effects models pooled effect size xlink "> thirty study selection utilized existing literature lacks cesarean section rate 42 ), compared continuous labor companion untrained labor companions familiar labor companions optimal beneficial effects effect size xlink ">cesarean rate trained companions labor companion beneficial effects labor companions maternal satisfaction cochrane risk bias tool 346 studies unfamiliar companions labor induction labor experience optimal characteristics widely acknowledged using mantel thorough search temporal associations temporal association systematic review science direct registration number publication bias providing insights original version neonatal outcomes measured outcomes insufficient evidence influential aspects improvement reported haenszel statistics google scholar geographical settings geographical locations confidence intervals confidence interval cochrane library analgesic usage 58 ).20 ).&# 8217

Licence

CC BY 4.0

Effectiveness of trained versus untrained labor companion.

History

Usage metrics

Categories

Keywords

Licence

Exports