pone.0226632.s001.docx (522.52 kB)
Download file

S1 File -

Download (522.52 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-12-18, 18:37 authored by So Hyun Paek, Do Kyun Kim, Jin Hee Lee, Young Ho Kwak

Figure A. Comparison of rate of compression (/mm) between five methods.

Figure B. Comparison of correct rate (%) between five methods.

Figure C. Comparison of correct finger position (%) between five methods.

Figure D. Comparison of correct chest recoil (%) between five methods.

Figure E. Comparison of satisfaction score between five methods.

Figure F. Comparison of fatigue score between five methods.

Figure G. Comparison of easiness score between five methods.

(DOCX)

History