Comparison of performance of multiple standard convolutional neural network (CNN) models for binary patch classification on mammography.
journal contribution
posted on 2025-04-08, 17:29 authored by MinJae Woo, Linglin Zhang, Beatrice Brown-Mulry, InChan Hwang, Judy Wawira Gichoya, Aimilia Gastounioti, Imon Banerjee, Laleh Seyyed-Kalantari, Hari TrivediComparison of performance of multiple standard convolutional neural network (CNN) models for binary patch classification on mammography.
History
Usage metrics
Keywords
rads density chelp develop fairfield digital mammogramsconducted using univariateconsidering confounding factorsclassification model achievedfalse negative ratefalse negative predictionsmammography may underperformdeep learning modelfalse positive ratemultivariate regression modelsunderstand performance gapspatches matched baseddeep learning modelscertain patient subgroups910 patches ),mammography pdeep learningnegative patchesbased classificationfalse positivesmaking modelsspecific subgroupspatient demographicsmultivariate analysiscreate positiveconfounding effects390 patches050 ),011 ),xlink ">white patientsultimately enhancingsubgroup evaluationsubgroup analysisstudy underscoresstudy evaluatessignificantly associatedsignificant predictorsresnet152v2 demonstratingnever biopsiedinterpretable decisionimaging featuresidentify imagingfindings suggestf1 scoredemographic characteristicsbest performancearchitectural distortion931 patients
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC