ic7b03181_si_001.pdf (5.85 MB)
Download fileApplication and Limitations of Nanocasting in Metal–Organic Frameworks
journal contribution
posted on 2018-02-20, 19:17 authored by Camille D. Malonzo, Zhao Wang, Jiaxin Duan, Wenyang Zhao, Thomas E. Webber, Zhanyong Li, In Soo Kim, Anurag Kumar, Aditya Bhan, Ana E. Platero-Prats, Karena W. Chapman, Omar K. Farha, Joseph T. Hupp, Alex B. F. Martinson, R. Lee Penn, Andreas SteinNanocasting
can be a useful strategy to transfer the catalytic metal clusters
in metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) to an all-inorganic support
such as silica. The incorporation of silica in the MOF pores as a
secondary support has the potential to extend the application of the
highly tunable metal-based active sites in MOFs to high temperature
catalysis. Here, we demonstrate the applicability of the nanocasting
method to a range of MOFs that incorporate catalytically attractive
hexazirconium, hexacerium, or pentanickel oxide-based clusters (UiO-66,
(Ce)UiO-66, (Ce)UiO-67, (Ce)MOF-808, DUT-9, and In- and Ni-postmetalated
NU-1000). We describe, in tutorial form, the challenges associated
with nanocasting of MOFs that are related to their small pore size
and to considerations of chemical and mechanical stability, and we
provide approaches to overcome some of these challenges. Some of these
nanocast materials feature the site-isolated clusters in a porous,
thermally stable silica matrix, suitable for catalysis at high temperatures;
in others, structural rearrangement of clusters or partial cluster
aggregation occurs, but extensive aggregation can be mitigated by
the silica skeleton introduced during nanocasting.