es6b05928_si_001.pdf (14.56 MB)
Download fileA Laboratory Comparison of Emission Factors, Number Size Distributions, and Morphology of Ultrafine Particles from 11 Different Household Cookstove-Fuel Systems
journal contribution
posted on 2017-05-09, 00:00 authored by Guofeng Shen, Chethan K. Gaddam, Seth M. Ebersviller, Randy L. Vander Wal, Craig Williams, Jerroll W. Faircloth, James J. Jetter, Michael D. HaysUltrafine particle (UFP) emissions
and particle number size distributions
(PNSD) are critical in the evaluation of air pollution impacts; however,
data on UFP number emissions from cookstoves, which are a major source
of many pollutants, are limited. In this study, 11 fuel-stove combinations
covering a variety of fuels and different stoves are investigated
for UFP emissions and PNSD. The combustion of LPG and alcohol (∼1011 particles per useful energy delivered, particles/MJd), and kerosene (∼1013 particles/MJd), produced emissions that were lower by 2–3 orders
of magnitude than solid fuels (1014–1015 particles/MJd). Three different PNSD typesunimodal
distributions with peaks ∼30–40 nm, unimodal distributions
with peaks <30 nm, and bimodal distributionswere observed
as the result of both fuel and stove effects. The fractions of particles
smaller than 30 nm (F30) varied among
the tested systems, ranging from 13% to 88%. The burning of LPG and
alcohol had the lowest PM2.5 mass emissions, UFP number
emissions, and F30 (13–21% for
LPG and 35–41% for alcohol). Emissions of PM2.5 and
UFP from kerosene were also low compared with solid fuel burning but
had a relatively high F30 value of approximately
73–80%.
History
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
Keywords
air pollution impactsLPGUltrafine Particles11 fuel-stove combinations30 nmstove effectsUFP number emissionsUFP emissionsF 30 valueHousehold Cookstove-Fuel Systems Ultrafine particleunimodal distributionsparticle number size distributionsPM 2.5 mass emissionsPM 2.5Laboratory ComparisonPNSDEmission FactorsF 30Number Size Distributions