A Laboratory Comparison of Emission Factors, Number Size Distributions, and Morphology of Ultrafine Particles from 11 Different Household Cookstove-Fuel Systems
journal contributionposted on 2017-05-09, 00:00 authored by Guofeng Shen, Chethan K. Gaddam, Seth M. Ebersviller, Randy L. Vander Wal, Craig Williams, Jerroll W. Faircloth, James J. Jetter, Michael D. Hays
Ultrafine particle (UFP) emissions and particle number size distributions (PNSD) are critical in the evaluation of air pollution impacts; however, data on UFP number emissions from cookstoves, which are a major source of many pollutants, are limited. In this study, 11 fuel-stove combinations covering a variety of fuels and different stoves are investigated for UFP emissions and PNSD. The combustion of LPG and alcohol (∼1011 particles per useful energy delivered, particles/MJd), and kerosene (∼1013 particles/MJd), produced emissions that were lower by 2–3 orders of magnitude than solid fuels (1014–1015 particles/MJd). Three different PNSD typesunimodal distributions with peaks ∼30–40 nm, unimodal distributions with peaks <30 nm, and bimodal distributionswere observed as the result of both fuel and stove effects. The fractions of particles smaller than 30 nm (F30) varied among the tested systems, ranging from 13% to 88%. The burning of LPG and alcohol had the lowest PM2.5 mass emissions, UFP number emissions, and F30 (13–21% for LPG and 35–41% for alcohol). Emissions of PM2.5 and UFP from kerosene were also low compared with solid fuel burning but had a relatively high F30 value of approximately 73–80%.
Read the peer-reviewed publication
air pollution impactsLPGUltrafine Particles11 fuel-stove combinations30 nmstove effectsUFP number emissionsUFP emissionsF 30 valueHousehold Cookstove-Fuel Systems Ultrafine particleunimodal distributionsparticle number size distributionsPM 2.5 mass emissionsPM 2.5Laboratory ComparisonPNSDEmission FactorsF 30Number Size Distributions