log-Relative selection strength and 95% confidence intervals of different tidal wetland types by seven GPS tagged great egrets at Tomales Bay, CA, 2017–2020, while accounting for tide-based changes in water depth.
figure
posted on 2021-12-31, 18:33 authored by Scott Jennings, David Lumpkin, Nils Warnock, T. Emiko Condeso, John P. Kelly<p>Other tidal areas (the reference level) were mostly unvegetated inter- and subtidal mud flats. Water depth represents the average depth in the 10 m<sup>2</sup> grid cell around where the bird was located. Negative values of water depth indicate the bird was located above predicted water level.</p>
History
Related Materials
Usage metrics
Categories
Keywords
studied habitat selectionrising sea levelslonger time scalesgreat egrets acrossgreat egret (<div >< pcomparing speed travelledardea alba </landscape may disruptalso evaluated differences>) habitat selectionshellfish aquaculture infrastructuresuitable foraging habitatmuch narrower rangecomparing natural wetlandsadjacent natural wetlandsshellfish aquaculture areasshellfish aquaculturenatural wetlandstidal wetlandsslight differencesmay change>) foragingnatural cycleswetland typeswater depthswater depthtomales baytidal marshtemperate estuaryresults suggestresults conditionalpassive processesoverall valuehuman alterationforaging behaviorenergy expendeddifferent habitatsconsequently changebased changesactive management
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC