Fig 11.TIF (726.94 kB)
Download file

Recovery accuracy for TFs based on simulated trials.

Download (0 kB)
posted on 2015-11-12, 03:05 authored by Gaurang Mahajan, Shekhar C. Mande

Comparison of recovery accuracy values yielded by the default method and iterative search over 104 random trials in the noiseless limit (left) and with 5% misclassification rate added to the binarized differential expression profile (right). The trials have been sorted in decreasing order of the difference between the accuracy values (Method C—default).