Figure_2.tif (558.9 kB)

Annotation comparison for E. coli O104 (TY2482) among AAMG pipeline, BG7 and reference annotation set from Broad Institute.

Download (0 kB)
figure
posted on 06.12.2013, 03:30 by Intikhab Alam, André Antunes, Allan Anthony Kamau, Wail Ba alawi, Manal Kalkatawi, Ulrich Stingl, Vladimir B. Bajic

Regarding the CDS annotation AAMG ranks second (with only 2 CDS region less annotated than BG7), while in annotation of orphan (hypothetical) CDS products (the less the better) and in annotation of functional (non-hypothetical) CDS products (the more the better) AAMG performs the best.

History

Licence

Exports