Figure_2.tif (558.9 kB)

Annotation comparison for E. coli O104 (TY2482) among AAMG pipeline, BG7 and reference annotation set from Broad Institute.

Download (0 kB)
posted on 06.12.2013 by Intikhab Alam, André Antunes, Allan Anthony Kamau, Wail Ba alawi, Manal Kalkatawi, Ulrich Stingl, Vladimir B. Bajic

Regarding the CDS annotation AAMG ranks second (with only 2 CDS region less annotated than BG7), while in annotation of orphan (hypothetical) CDS products (the less the better) and in annotation of functional (non-hypothetical) CDS products (the more the better) AAMG performs the best.