figshare
Browse

Annotation comparison for <i>E. coli</i> O104 (TY2482) among AAMG pipeline, BG7 and reference annotation set from Broad Institute.

Download (0 kB)
figure
posted on 2013-12-06, 03:30 authored by Intikhab Alam, André Antunes, Allan Anthony Kamau, Wail Ba alawi, Manal Kalkatawi, Ulrich Stingl, Vladimir B. Bajic
<p>Regarding the CDS annotation AAMG ranks second (with only 2 CDS region less annotated than BG7), while in annotation of orphan (hypothetical) CDS products (the less the better) and in annotation of functional (non-hypothetical) CDS products (the more the better) AAMG performs the best.</p>

History

Usage metrics

    PLOS ONE

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC