Ten ICP signals ordered according to their IMF2 Hurst exponent.
figure
posted on 2024-12-30, 18:37 authored by Donatien Legé, Pierre-Henri Murgat, Russell Chabanne, Kevin Lagarde, Clément Magand, Jean-François Payen, Marion Prud’homme, Yoann Launey, Laurent GergeléLeft column: Five lowest Hurst exponents over the whole dataset. Right column: Five highest Hurst exponents over the whole dataset.
(TIFF)
History
Usage metrics
Categories
Keywords
xlink "> realreceiving operator curveimplemented without dependence95 %- ci20 minutes priorpatient &# 821773 &# 821261 &# 8212pressure relationship withindegree postural shiftcerebral compliance assessmentinduced icp elevationone classification taskicp signal independentlyicp signal&# 8220positional shiftoverall oneintracranial pressureintracranial complianceclassification modelstime monitoringthree classesstudy highlightsstill unexploredselection steproutine partrelated increasepresent studypotential valueoften referredneurocritical caremainly usedintracranial hypertensioninput setinjured patientsextract informationdifferent combinationsdetect episodescerebrospinal systembrain injuryalso indicative87 ]).83 ]).54 brain
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC