<p dir="ltr"><b>Figure S1:</b><b> </b>The number of lipid molecules in plasma was counted.<b>Figure S</b><b>2</b><b>:</b><b> </b>Bar graph with standard error of the proportion (%) of the total kurtosis of the lipid subclasses in plasma. The X-axis is the subclass of lipids, the Y-axis is the proportion (%) of the total kurtosis, and the bar graph represents the Mean+SE of the sample group.Figure S3:Comparative analysis of the relative content of lipid group subclasses in the plasma. (A) Relative abundance of significantly up-regulated lipid group subclasses. (B) Relative abundance of significantly down-regulated lipid group subclasses. (Significance is shown using Welch’s t-test, with the specific p-value noted in the graph and also denoted by asterisks (*, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01, ***, p < 0.001, ****, p < 0.0001); ns, no significance (p > 0.05).<b>Figure S</b><b>4</b><b>:</b>Volcano diagram of plasma differential lipid molecules.<b>Figure S</b><b>5</b>: Statistics of differential lipid molecules.<b>Figure S</b><b>6</b><b>: </b>Hierarchical clustering plot of significantly different lipids of plasma.<b>Figure S</b><b>7a</b><b>: </b>Heat map of correlation coefficient matrix for Top300 significantly different lipid molecules.<b>Figure S7</b><b>b</b><b>: </b>Heat map of correlation coefficient matrix for Top10 significantly different lipid molecules.<b>Figure S</b><b>8</b><b>: </b>Bar graph of KEGG pathway enrichment.</p><p dir="ltr"><br></p>
