Fig 4.TIF (3.12 MB)
Download fileNumber of Paths Selected by the Two Algorithms.
figure
posted on 2016-10-04, 17:40 authored by Yan Qiao, Jun Jiao, Yuan Rao, Huimin Ma(a)AS1239 in model 1(b)AS1239 in model 2(c)AS1239 in model 3(d)AS1755 in model 1(e)AS1755 in model 2(f)AS1755 in model 3(g)AS3356 in model 1(h)AS3356 in model 2(i)AS3356 in model 3(j)AS6461 in model 1(k)AS6461 in model 2(l)AS6461 in model 3(m)Legend.
History
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
Keywords
paths sequentiallylink loss ratespath selection methodgraph constructionNetwork Tomography Applicationspath loss ratesLink Loss Inferencenetwork tomography applicationsloss ratesadaptive path selection methodtraffic overheads0 loss rateslink loss inferencedecomposition approachAdaptive Path Selection