Image_1_A Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals a Rich Genetic Architecture of Flour Color-Related Traits in Bread Wheat.PDF
Flour color-related traits, including brightness (L*), redness (a*), yellowness (b*) and yellow pigment content (YPC), are very important for end-use quality of wheat. Uncovering the genetic architecture of these traits is necessary for improving wheat quality by marker-assisted selection (MAS). In the present study, a genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed on a collection of 166 bread wheat cultivars to better understand the genetic architecture of flour color-related traits using the wheat 90 and 660 K SNP arrays, and 10 allele-specific markers for known genes influencing these traits. Fifteen, 28, 25, and 32 marker–trait associations (MTAs) for L*, a*, b*, and YPC, respectively, were detected, explaining 6.5–20.9% phenotypic variation. Seventy-eight loci were consistent across all four environments. Compared with previous studies, Psy-A1, Psy-B1, Pinb-D1, and the 1B•1R translocation controlling flour color-related traits were confirmed, and four loci were novel. Two and 11 loci explained much more phenotypic variation of a* and YPC than phytoene synthase 1 gene (Psy1), respectively. Sixteen candidate genes were predicted based on biochemical information and bioinformatics analyses, mainly related to carotenoid biosynthesis and degradation, terpenoid backbone biosynthesis and glycolysis/gluconeogenesis. The results largely enrich our knowledge of the genetic basis of flour color-related traits in bread wheat and provide valuable markers for wheat quality improvement. The study also indicated that GWAS was a powerful strategy for dissecting flour color-related traits and identifying candidate genes based on diverse genotypes and high-throughput SNP arrays.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpls.2015.00743
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jcs.2011.07.002
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pgen.1000940
- https://doi.org//10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308
- https://doi.org//10.1534/genetics.105.044586
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00238-8
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11032-014-0183-3
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12864-016-3395-6
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00438-013-0767-3
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11032-012-9812-x
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41598-017-04028-6
- https://doi.org//10.1111/aab.12108
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02591.x
- https://doi.org//10.2135/cropsci2011.07.0365
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s001220050636
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11032-009-9255-1
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00122-007-0660-8
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10142-009-0121-3
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpls.2016.01032
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10681-007-9484-5
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12870-017-1167-3
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0132787
- https://doi.org//10.1071/AR01048
- https://doi.org//10.1006/jcrs.2002.0505
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11032-007-9147-1
- https://doi.org//10.1086/302959
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11103-012-9972-4
- https://doi.org//10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01089.x
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10681-012-0628-x
- https://doi.org//10.1111/pbi.12690
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0141339
- https://doi.org//10.2135/cropsci2009.12.0711
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.08.004
- https://doi.org//10.1111/pbi.12183
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.pbi.2008.12.007
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.copbio.2006.02.003
- https://doi.org//10.1038/ng1702
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12870-015-0514-5
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpls.2016.01197
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00122-015-2634-6
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12870-016-0916-z
- https://doi.org//10.2135/cropsci2010.12.0689
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00122-007-0697-8
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10681-008-9744-z
- https://doi.org//10.1038/ncomms1467
- https://doi.org//10.3835/plantgenome2008.02.0089