Elevations for each wetland type.
figure
posted on 2021-12-31, 18:33 authored by Scott Jennings, David Lumpkin, Nils Warnock, T. Emiko Condeso, John P. KellyDensity of used and available points for each wetland type across the range of depths considered, for investigating habitat selection by GPS-tagged great egrets at Tomales Bay, CA, 2017–2020. Lines represent density of available and used points at each depth for each wetland type. Negative depth values indicate locations above the predicted water level.
(TIF)
History
Usage metrics
Categories
Keywords
studied habitat selectionrising sea levelslonger time scalesgreat egrets acrossgreat egret (<div >< pcomparing speed travelledardea alba landscape may disruptalso evaluated differences>) habitat selectionshellfish aquaculture infrastructuresuitable foraging habitatmuch narrower rangecomparing natural wetlandsadjacent natural wetlandsshellfish aquaculture areasshellfish aquaculturenatural wetlandstidal wetlandsslight differencesmay change>) foragingnatural cycleswetland typeswater depthswater depthtomales baytidal marshtemperate estuaryresults suggestresults conditionalpassive processesoverall valuehuman alterationforaging behaviorenergy expendeddifferent habitatsconsequently changebased changesactive management
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC