pone.0277513.g002.tif (2.88 MB)
Download fileEffect of poultry red mite load at the time of scoring on plumage condition (A) and skin injuries (B) during the laying period.
figure
posted on 2022-11-11, 18:22 authored by Ruben Schreiter, Marion Herzog, Markus FreickPRM–poultry red mite; LM–laying month. Quartiles were calculated for the mean mite mass (of 10 mite traps) per flock and monitoring date using data from the entire study period: Flocks were classified for each monitoring date as follows: PRM / (low mite load, i.e. flocks with mean mite mass <1. quartile), PRM + (moderate mite load, i.e. flocks with mite mass between 1.- 3. quartile), and PRM ++ (high mite load, i.e. flocks with mite mass >3. quartile). The percentage shown per plumage score corresponds to the arithmetic mean of the three assessed plumage regions (dorsal neck, back, and belly plumage).
History
Usage metrics
Categories
Keywords
practical experience suggestspoultry red mitelongitudinal study identifieddermanyssus gallinae average flock sizesevere feather pecking1 .- 3commercial laying flocks28 laying flocks0 8211prm load tendedlaying hen flockstrap ), correspondingincreasing prm infestationfree housing systemsprm ),prm loadlaying periodlaying henssevere ectoparasitehen age3 mgprm infestationhousing systemhousing conditions>) loadtrap ).survey timesskin lesionsskin injuriessignificant problemrisk factorplumage damageplumage conditionmultifactorial causemedian countintegument scoringhybrid typecentral complexesbased findingsanimal welfarealthough evidence8 mites357 birds2 mites097 ).001 ).