pone.0243830.g002.tif (414.24 kB)
Download fileComparisons of CC FD% (left) and mean CC FD size (right) between study groups.
figure
posted on 11.12.2020, 18:30 authored by Yining Dai, Hao Zhou, Qinqin Zhang, Zhongdi Chu, Lisa C. Olmos de Koo, Jennifer R. Chao, Kasra A. Rezaei, Steven S. Saraf, Ruikang K. WangKruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction was performed in pairwise comparisons of the FD% and the mean FD size, respectively. Brackets indicate statistically significant differences between corresponding study groups. CC, choriocapillaris; FD, flow deficit; FD%, percentage of CC FDs; NPDR, nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy; PDR, proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
History
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
Keywords
Methods Diabetic subjects5- mm-diameter circleCC perfusion status27 control subjectsConclusions CC perfusionflow deficitscoherence tomography angiography st...proliferative DRCC FD sizeCC flow deficitsSS-OCTAFD sizeQuantitative assessmentCC flow deficit sizecoherence tomography angiographynonproliferative DRchoriocapillaris flow deficitsface CC blood flow imagesmacular region