Changes in Vanderbilt Inattention scores.
figure
posted on 2021-02-04, 18:31 authored by Barbora G. Jurigova, Molly R. Gerdes, Joaquin A. Anguera, Elysa J. Marco<p>Vanderbilt Inattention mean scores displayed separately for typically developing children (TDC), children with Sensory Processing Dysfunction only (SPD), and children with SPD combined with inattention (SPD<sub>+IA</sub>) groups at 4 time points: pre-assessment [N = 49, N(TDC) = 22, N(SPD) = 10, N(SPD<sub>+IA</sub>) = 17], post-assessment [N = 46, N(TDC) = 20, N(SPD) = 10, N(SPD<sub>+IA</sub>) = 16], 9-month follow-up [N = 45, N(TDC) = 21, N(SPD) = 8, N(SPD<sub>+IA</sub>) = 16], and 3-year follow-up [N = 39, N(TDC) = 19, N(SPD) = 7, N(SPD<sub>+IA</sub>) = 13]. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean.</p>
History
Related Materials
- 1. DOI - Is supplement to Sustained benefits of cognitive training in children with inattention, three-year follow-up
Usage metrics
Categories
Keywords
EVOAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Dis...IA cohorthealth interventionattention-based issuesfollow-up assessmentSPDIA individualsinattentionresearch criteriaSustained benefitsProjectfindingmeeting criteriaSensory Processing DysfunctionEquations analysistraining interventionparent-reported scoresVanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Parent R...completion rate
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC