figshare
Browse

AVR-Mgk1 is predicted to be a MAX fold protein that belongs to a distinct family from AVR-Pik effectors.

Download (1.82 MB)
figure
posted on 2023-01-19, 18:28 authored by Yu Sugihara, Yoshiko Abe, Hiroki Takagi, Akira Abe, Motoki Shimizu, Kazue Ito, Eiko Kanzaki, Kaori Oikawa, Jiorgos Kourelis, Thorsten Langner, Joe Win, Aleksandra Białas, Daniel Lüdke, Mauricio P. Contreras, Izumi Chuma, Hiromasa Saitoh, Michie Kobayashi, Shuan Zheng, Yukio Tosa, Mark J. Banfield, Sophien Kamoun, Ryohei Terauchi, Koki Fujisaki

(A) Domain architecture and amino acid sequence of AVR-Mgk1. We used SignalP v6.0 [106] to predict SP sequences in AVR-Mgk1. AVR-Mgk1 has the 2 cysteine residues (Cys27 and Cys67, indicated by black arrowheads) conserved in the MAX effector superfamily. (B) Clustering of putative M. oryzae AVR protein sequences using TRIBE-MCL [107]. Tribe-MCL assigned AVR-Mgk1 and AVR-PikD into different tribes. If a tribe includes an experimentally characterized protein, it is shown to represent the tribe. If a tribe includes an experimentally validated MAX effector protein or AVR-Mgk1, the tribe is shown in orange. Tribes having only 1 protein are not shown. (C) AVR-Mgk1 protein structure predicted by AlphaFold2 [108]. AVR-Mgk1 has antiparallel β sheets, characteristic of the MAX effector superfamily. (D) Protein structure of AVR-PikD (PDB ID: 6FU9 chain B) [71]. (E) Structure-based protein alignment between AVR-Mgk1 and AVR-PikD. TM-align [109] revealed significant structural similarity between AVR-Mgk1 and AVR-PikD, while the regions highlighted in pink structurally differ (C, D). This structural difference involves the highly polymorphic residues (His46-Pro47-Gly48) of AVR-Pik effectors that determine Pik-1 HMA domain binding and are probably modulated by arms race coevolution [70,96]. The data underlying Fig 6B and 6E can be found in S1 Data. AVR, avirulence; HMA, heavy metal-associated; SP, signal peptide.

History