Table_1.xls (5.5 kB)

Comparison of methods on the top 500 superfamilies of CATH.

Name: Comparison of methods on the top 500 superfamilies of CATH.
Published: 2013-12-31T03:15:26+00:00
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Keywords: biophysics, Protein folding, Computational biology, Macromolecular structure analysis, protein structure, proteomics, Proteomic databases, algorithms, signal processing, data mining, Image processing, Statistical signal processing, Applied mathematics, statistics, Decision theory, methods, 500, superfamilies

dataset

posted on 2013-12-31, 03:15 authored by Jian-Yu Shi, Siu-Ming Yiu, Yan-Ning Zhang, Francis Yuk-Lun Chin

RF:Radom Forest, SVM:Support Vector Machines.

The four levels, C, A, T and H contain 4, 33, 328 and 500 types respectively.

The value pair separated by “/” in each cell means the accuracies of classification on CATH_32 and CATH_33New.

Comparison of methods on the top 500 superfamilies of CATH.

History

Usage metrics

Categories

Keywords

Licence

Exports