figshare
Browse

Z-scores outperform similar methods for analyzing CRISPR paralog synthetic lethality screens

Version 2 2025-07-03, 00:20
Version 1 2025-06-13, 23:43
dataset
posted on 2025-07-03, 00:20 authored by Juihsuan ChouJuihsuan Chou, Nazanin Esmaeili AnvarNazanin Esmaeili Anvar, Traver HartTraver Hart, Junjie Chen, Reem A. Elghaish
<p dir="ltr">Genetic screens offer a promising strategy for identifying tumor-specific therapeutic targets, but single-gene knockout screens often miss functionally redundant paralogs. Multiplex Cas9 and Cas12a CRISPR systems have been deployed to assay genetic interactions, but analysis pipelines vary considerably. Here we evaluate data from four in4mer CRISPR/Cas12a screens in cancer cell lines, using delta log fold change, Z-transformed dLFC, and rescaled dLFC approaches to identify synthetic lethal interactions. Both ZdLFC and RdLFC provide more consistent identification of synthetic lethal pairs across cell lines compared to the unscaled dLFC method, while ZdLFC benefits from not requiring a training set of known interactors.</p>

History

Usage metrics

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC