cm9b04631_si_010.xyz (11.06 kB)
Download fileUnderstanding How Ligand Functionalization Influences CO2 and N2 Adsorption in a Sodalite Metal–Organic Framework
dataset
posted on 2020-02-13, 19:38 authored by Mehrdad Asgari, Rocio Semino, Pascal A. Schouwink, Ilia Kochetygov, Jacob Tarver, Olga Trukhina, Rajamani Krishna, Craig M. Brown, Michele Ceriotti, Wendy L. QueenIn this work, a detailed
study is conducted to understand how ligand
substitution influences the CO2 and N2 adsorption
properties of two highly crystalline sodalite metal–organic
frameworks (MOFs) known as Cu–BTT (BTT–3 =
1,3,5-benzenetristetrazolate) and Cu–BTTri (BTTri–3 = 1,3,5-benzenetristriazolate). The enthalpy of adsorption and observed
adsorption capacities at a given pressure are significantly lower
for Cu–BTTri compared to its tetrazole counterpart, Cu–BTT.
In situ X-ray and neutron diffraction, which allow visualization of
the CO2 and N2 binding sites on the internal
surface of Cu–BTTri, provide insights into understanding the
subtle differences. As expected, slightly elongated distances between
the open Cu2+ sites and surface-bound CO2 in
Cu–BTTri can be explained by the fact that the triazolate ligand
is a better electron donor than the tetrazolate. The more pronounced
Jahn–Teller effect in Cu–BTTri leads to weaker guest
binding. The results of the aforementioned structural analysis were
complemented by the prediction of the binding energies at each CO2 and N2 adsorption site by density functional theory
calculations. In addition, variable temperature in situ diffraction
measurements shed light on the fine structural changes of the framework
and CO2 occupancies at different adsorption sites as a
function of temperature. Finally, simulated breakthrough curves obtained
for both sodalite MOFs demonstrate the materials’ potential
performance in dry postcombustion CO2 capture. The simulation,
which considers both framework uptake capacity and selectivity, predicts
better separation performance for Cu–BTT. The information obtained
in this work highlights how ligand substitution can influence adsorption
properties and hence provides further insights into the material optimization
for important separations.