Two Structures Toward Understanding Evolution from Surfactant-Polyoxometalate Lamellae to Surfactant-Encapsulated Polyoxometalates
datasetposted on 05.08.2009 by May Nyman, Mark A. Rodriguez, Travis M. Anderson, David Ingersoll
Datasets usually provide raw data for analysis. This raw data often comes in spreadsheet form, but can be any collection of data, on which analysis can be performed.
Surfactant-POM (polyoxometalate) phases are fascinating in both their self-assembly behavior and their utility as catalysts, probes, and photochromic, electrochromic, and magnetic devices. Well-ordered lamellar phases are formed when the surfactant:POM ratio is 4:1 or 2:1, and these have been described in great detail from single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies. However, the surfactant-encapsulated clusters (SECs) with much larger surfactant:POM ratios do not form single-crystals readily. Thus less is known about their structural detail, and the evolution from the well-ordered lamellar phases to the SECs with increasing surfactant:POM ratio has not been detailed. We present here two structures that have resulted from an investigation of understanding the evolution of the surfactant-POM lamellar phase as the surfactant:POM ratio increases. [H2SiMo12O40][CH3CN]2[C16H33N(CH3)3]4 (monoclinic #4, P21 a = 12.636(2) Å, b = 20.577(4) Å, c = 22.364(4) Å, β = 93.394(4)°) holds true to the preference of 4:1 surfactant:POM ratio in well-ordered crystalline phases, whereas [HxSiMo12O40][C16H33N(CH3)3]5[CH3CN]4 (triclinic No. 2, P1̅, a = 12.513(7) Å, b = 23.37(1) Å, c = 24.44(1) Å, α = 93.418(8)°, β = 92.046(8)°, γ = 99.113(7)°) provides the first example of a surfactant-POM phase with a surfactant:POM ratio >4. This structure provides a glimpse of the structural evolution from ordered lamellar POM-surfactant phases to more disordered phases such as the SECs.