figshare
Browse
IMAGE
57a22799f3a7294270fa26625908d8b04c3c2580.tif (3.06 MB)
IMAGE
6759dbcc7e31a56873c6431205d64a245b12d584.png (755.67 kB)
IMAGE
dbddf29aabf18f07358828612b4e5408de961c66.jpg (7.16 kB)
IMAGE
c8ad7a72d87549ac8275437f2b3f4f9e97fd627c.tif (987.36 kB)
IMAGE
5d7774372326e5b41bce9729a8afbf52d874c3c4.png (190.32 kB)
IMAGE
6c6c5caa54ab54c37ec6a37f4f718d4f4ccf1113.jpg (7.51 kB)
IMAGE
260c2498b4baaa9a341f26712eee6f08bd17cdcc.tif (975.71 kB)
IMAGE
66c3996333535bef2397b0b83cfb312a813c7f4a.png (225.63 kB)
IMAGE
2c0499eab162d7d9a1e36163ebbcc9b567e57469.jpg (5.61 kB)
IMAGE
9490d62c4825c806f6717c2fa01a01d8c6e6a6d1.tif (584.68 kB)
IMAGE
a2acf6bc2a79597a42ab3b0763615f8ee8337ea5.png (38.66 kB)
IMAGE
9e7bf0f523d09bb8b0c0c09bee0a9da525030bac.jpg (4.36 kB)
IMAGE
70a2cc9aa4976db8d608267e49a0d7115ad5e052.tif (1.26 MB)
IMAGE
da63ba569175619f79dbce9d518e50a3a5c7d8b1.png (356.26 kB)
IMAGE
782f122c4eabc5b524d67131993b9ecf33dc6b90.jpg (5.42 kB)
IMAGE
e10dd661964b34e254dfb660ce3e56cb711a209e.tif (3.07 MB)
IMAGE
ed7efdab031cfd20bade699c9a175e355e0b7a9b.png (814.93 kB)
IMAGE
2f5966d8d38ad90ee40d6c60a54e9f3779d6e81a.jpg (7.32 kB)
IMAGE
fe55c5c973d6ef6fd67f0476780b519c02b7c23d.tif (948.84 kB)
IMAGE
04ad29909624a187f8db685ec20111347c01629d.png (178.39 kB)
1/0
43 files

Surgical-orthodontic retreatment of a severe skeletal Class III malocclusion following an orthodontic camouflage

dataset
posted on 2022-05-27, 14:49 authored by Francisco MARTINO, Manuel PEÑA, Rony JOUBERT

ABSTRACT Introduction: Class III malocclusions are some of the most difficult occlusal anomalies to be treated. Some patients with this condition may require orthognathic surgery, while others may be treated with dental camouflage. Proper patient assessment and selection remains critical in order to achieve favorable results. Objectives: This report outlines the case of an 18-year-old male who sought retreatment for a severe skeletal Class III dentofacial deformity after undergoing orthodontic camouflage treatment involving mandibular arch extractions. A treatment plan comprising dental decompensation and orthognathic surgery was implemented in order to achieve optimal facial and occlusal results. Results: After 28 months of treatment, skeletal and dental correction was achieved and facial features were significantly improved. The orthognathic surgery required a 20-mm sagittal maxillomandibular skeletal correction, combined with a 4-mm correction of the midlines and a 2-mm impaction of the maxilla. Conclusion: Dental compensation may be a risky treatment alternative for severe dentoskeletal discrepancies. In these patients, orthodontics combined with orthognathic surgery is the recommended treatment option.

History

Usage metrics

    Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC