figshare
Browse

Supplementary Table S4 from Timing of ctDNA Analysis Aimed at Guiding Adjuvant Treatment in Colorectal Cancer

Download (20.33 kB)
dataset
posted on 2025-05-01, 07:21 authored by Tenna V. Henriksen, Christina Demuth, Amanda Frydendahl, Jesper Nors, Marijana Nesic, Mads H. Rasmussen, Ole H. Larsen, Claudia Jaensch, Uffe S. Løve, Per V. Andersen, Thomas Kolbro, Ole Thorlacius-Ussing, Alessio Monti, Jeppe Kildsig, Peter Bondeven, Nis H. Schlesinger, Lene H. Iversen, Kåre A. Gotschalck, Claus L. Andersen

Supplementary Table S4. Information on all ddPCR assays.

Funding

Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF)

Danish Cancer Society

NEYE Foundation

Knud og Edith Eriksens Mindefond (KEE MEMORIAL FUND)

Direktør Emil C. Hertz og hustru Inger Hertz’ Fond

Fabrikant Einar Willumsens Mindelegat (Manufacturer Einar Willumsens Minelegat)

Innovationfund Denmark

Sygeforskring Danmark

Danish Cancer Research Foundation

KV Fonden (KV Foundation)

Lundbeck Foundation (Lundbeckfonden)

History

ARTICLE ABSTRACT

Multiple clinical trials are investigating ctDNA to guide adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in colorectal cancer. Timely ACT initiation necessitates early ctDNA testing, but the impact of postoperative cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and ctDNA dynamics remains unclear, particularly with cost-reducing input caps employed in some assays. This study investigates ctDNA detection at day 14 versus day 30, comparing whole-sample analysis with capping the cfDNA input, and evaluates single and dual timepoint assessments for ACT allocation. From 2019 to 2023, 611 patients with stage I to III colorectal cancer were enrolled. Blood was collected preoperatively and postoperatively on ∼day 14 and ∼day 30. The cfDNA levels were assessed using digital PCR, and ctDNA was assessed using tumor-informed digital PCR or targeted sequencing analyzing all cfDNA from 8 mL of plasma. Despite elevated cfDNA in 85% of day 14 samples, performance was comparable between the two timepoints (sensitivity, 31% vs. 32% and specificity, both 98%). A 50-ng cfDNA input cap reduced ctDNA detection probability, affecting 78% of day 14 samples and 65% of day 30 samples. At both timepoints, ctDNA detection was prognostic of recurrence (day 14; HR, 9.0, 95% confidence interval, 5.5–14.8 and day 30: HR, 12.5, 95% confidence interval, 7.6–20.4). In 74% of ctDNA-positive recurrence patients, both samples had ctDNA detected. An increase in the ctDNA level from day 14 to day 30 was associated with a shorter time to recurrence (Pearson R = −0.63, P = 0.003). Combining the timepoints would increase sensitivity (36%) and allow earlier ACT start in 80% of patients. Early ctDNA sampling is feasible and highly prognostic. Supplemental later testing may improve sensitivity while allowing early ACT initiation for most ctDNA-positive patients.