figshare
Browse

Sensitive Valence Structures of [(pap)2Ru(Q)]n (n = +2, +1, 0, −1, −2) with Two Different Redox Noninnocent Ligands, Q = 3,5-Di-tert-butyl-N-aryl-1,2-benzoquinonemonoimine and pap = 2-Phenylazopyridine

Download (31.35 kB)
dataset
posted on 2009-10-19, 00:00 authored by Dipanwita Das, Tapan Kumar Mondal, Shaikh M. Mobin, Goutam Kumar Lahiri
The complexes [(pap)2Ru(Q)]ClO4, [1]ClO4−[4]ClO4, with two different redox noninnocent ligands, Q = 3,5-di-tert-butyl-N-aryl-1,2-benzoquinonemonoimine (-aryl = m-(Cl)2C6H3 (1+), C6H5 (2+), m-(OCH3)2C6H3 (3+), and m-(tBu)2C6H3 (4+)) and pap = 2-phenylazopyridine, have been synthesized and characterized using various analytical techniques. The single-crystal X-ray structure of the representative [2]ClO4·C7H8 exhibits multiple intermolecular C−H···O hydrogen bondings and C−H···π interactions. The C1−O1 = 1.287(4) (density functional theory, DFT, 1.311) and C6−N1 = 1.320(4) (DFT, 1.353) Å and intraring bond distances associated with the sensitive quinine (Q) moiety along with the azo(pap) bond distances, N3−N4 = 1.278(4) (DFT, 1.297) and N6−N7 = 1.271(4) (DFT, 1.289) Å, in 2+ justify the [(pap)2RuII(Q•−)]+ valence configuration at the native state of 1+4+. Consequently, Mulliken spin densities on Q, pap, and Ru in 2+ are calculated to be 0.8636, 0.1040, and 0.0187, respectively, and 1+4+ exhibit free radical sharp EPR spectra and one weak and broad transition around 1000 nm in CH3CN due to interligand transition involving a singly occupied molecular orbital (SOMO) of Q•− and the vacant π* orbital of pap. Compounds 1+4+ undergo a quasi-reversible oxidation and three successive reductions. The valence structure of the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR)-inactive oxidized state in 12+42+ has been established as [(pap)2RuII(Q°)]2+ instead of the alternate formalism of antiferromagnetically coupled [(pap)2RuIII(Q•−)]2+ on the basis of the DFT calculations on the optimized 2+, which predict that the singly occupied molecular orbital is primarily composed of Q with 77% contribution. Accordingly, the optimized structure of 22+ predicts shorter C1−O1 (1.264) and C6−N1 (1.317 Å) distances and longer Ru1−O1 (2.080) and Ru1−N1 (2.088 Å) distances. Compounds 12+42+ exhibit the lowest energy transitions around 600 nm, corresponding to Ru(dπ)/Q(π) → pap(π*). The presence of two sets of strongly π-acceptor ligands, pap and Q, in 12+42+ stabilizes the Ru(II) state to a large extent such that the further oxidation of {RuII−Q°} → {RuIII−Q°} has not been detected within +2.0 V versus a saturated calomel electrode. The EPR-inactive reduced states 14 have been formulated as [(pap)2RuII(Q2−)] over the antiferromagnetically coupled alternate configuration, [(pap)(pap•−)RuII(Q•−)]. The optimized structure of 2 predicts sensitive C1−O1 and C6−N1 bond distances of 1.337 and 1.390 Å, respectively, close to the doubly reduced Q2− state, whereas the NN distances of pap, N3−N4 = 1.299 and N6−N7 = 1.306 Å, remain close to the neutral state. In corroboration with the doubly reduced Q2− state, 14 exhibit a moderately strong interligand π(Q2−) → π*(pap) transition in the near-IR region near 1300 nm. The subsequent two reductions are naturally centered around the azo functions of the pap ligands.

History