figshare
Browse
1/1
10 files

SARS-CoV-2 RNA in blood

Version 8 2020-09-29, 12:28
Version 7 2020-07-13, 22:06
Version 6 2020-06-24, 07:55
Version 5 2020-06-23, 14:28
Version 4 2020-06-15, 22:01
Version 3 2020-05-26, 07:40
dataset
posted on 2020-09-29, 12:28 authored by Monique Andersson, eleanor barnes, Tom Beneke, Derrick Crook, Louise Downs, David Eyre, Heli Harvala, William James, Anita Justice, Paul Klenerman, Sheila F. Lumley, Philippa MatthewsPhilippa Matthews, Anna McNaughtonAnna McNaughton, Alexander J. Mentzer, Rutger J. Ploeg, Jeremy Ratcliff, David Roberts, Malcolm G. Semple, Nicole StoesserNicole Stoesser, Lance Turtle, Maria Zambon

This dataset provides supplementary material for a report of the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in blood and blood products.


Extended Data File 1: Metadata table providing data for prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in blood and blood products based on a systematic literature review. Details of 28 citations are presented, and the 22 studies included in quantitative meta-analysis are indicated.


Extended Data File 2: qRT-PCR quantification of vRNA from sera and viral culture assays. Calculation of vRNA copy numbers, and qRT-PCR results in figure and table format.


Underlying Data File 1: Metadata table providing underlying data for serum samples from adults with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, based on RT-PCR nose/throat swab. Sheet 1: samples obtained through patients recruited into a UK clinical cohort at Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (n=212 samples from 167 unique individuals). Cells highlighted in blue show follow-up samples collected from the same individual at different time points. Cells highlighted in orange show serum PCR positives. Sheet 2: samples obtained from convalescent donors a minimum of 28 days post resolution of symptoms, via NHS Blood and Transplant, NHSBT (n=142 samples from 142 individuals).


RT-PCR Primer sequences: provided in a .xlsx file.


PRISMA checklist: reporting for systematic review and meta-analysis


STROBE checklist: reporting for cohort studies


Fig 4A-D: raw, unedited microscope images of cell cultures. Dates of each image stored in the format YYYYMMDD.

(A) and (B) are controls:

(A) Negative control Vero E6 cells in media;

(B) Cytopathic effect (CPE) in Vero E6 cells spiked with Victoria/01/2020 SARS-CoV-2.

(C) and (D) are Vero E6 cells inoculated with 1/10 dilution of serum sample from sample VC12 (patient ID UKCOV040), that tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by RT-PCR:

(C) Aberrant cellular effects at day 4 in a culture inoculated with VC12 at day 0;

(D) Normal appearance of cells at day 7 inoculated with 1/10 dilution of the culture supernatant of the VC12-challenged culture, illustrated in (C).


Funding

National Institute for Health Research [award CO-CIN-01], Medical Research Council [grant MC_PC_19059], Sepsis Immunomics funding from the Wellcome Trust [204969/Z/16/Z)] National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections at University of Liverpool in partnership with Public Health England (PHE), in collaboration with Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine and the University of Oxford [NIHR award 200907], Wellcome Trust and Department for International Development [215091/Z/18/Z], The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1209135], Liverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre (infrastructure support) [ref: C18616/A25153], NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. DWE is a Robertson Foundation Fellow. PCM and LT hold Wellcome fellowships [ref 110110/Z/15/Z and 205228/Z/16/Z respectively]. EB is an NIHR Senior Investigator. Laboratory work for this study was also funded by the generous support of philanthropic donors to the University of Oxford’s COVID-19 Research Response Fund.

History